These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. A comparative study of poly(glycolic acid) and catgut as suture materials. Histomorphology and mechanical properties. Pavan A, Bosio M, Longo T. J Biomed Mater Res; 1979 May; 13(3):477-96. PubMed ID: 155699 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Experimental study in the urinary tract of a new smooth surface absorbable synthetic monofilament (author's transl)]. Beurton D, Gonties D, Terdjman S, Abraham SH, Dana A. J Urol (Paris); 1981 May; 87(5):295-303. PubMed ID: 6792291 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Oral tissue reactions to suture materials. Selvig KA, Biagiotti GR, Leknes KN, Wikesjö UM. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1998 Oct; 18(5):474-87. PubMed ID: 10093524 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat. Outlaw KK, Vela AR, O'Leary JP. Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of polyglycolic aicd sutures in colon anastomoses. Letwin ER. Can J Surg; 1975 Jan; 18(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 1091339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Abdominal wound closure. A comparison of polydioxanone, polypropylene, and Teflon-coated braided Dacron sutures. Kon ND, Meredith JW, Poole GV, Martin MB, Kawamoto E, Myers RT. Am Surg; 1984 Oct; 50(10):549-51. PubMed ID: 6237599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials. Chu CC, Kizil Z. Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of relative bowel rest on healing of colonic anastomoses. Breaking strength and collagen in the colonic wall following left colon resection and anastomosis in the rat. Blomquist P, Jiborn H, Zederfeldt B. Acta Chir Scand; 1984 Mar; 150(8):671-5. PubMed ID: 6532041 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of different absorbable sutures on healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses. Deveney KE, Way LW. Am J Surg; 1977 Jan; 133(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 835784 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The reaction of kidney and bladder tissue to catgut and reconstituted collagen sutures. Bartone FF, Shires TK. Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1969 Jun; 128(6):1221-5. PubMed ID: 5781847 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Oesophageal tissue reaction to different suture materials. An experimental study in the cat. Senyk J, Rank F. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Jun; 12(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 725566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of the degree of abdominal adhesion formation associated with chromic catgut and polypropylene suture materials. Rochat MC, Lin J, Pope ER, Carson WL, Wagner-Mann CC, Pace LW. Am J Vet Res; 1996 Jun; 57(6):943-7. PubMed ID: 8725827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Further studies with polyglycolic acid (Dexon) and other sutures in infected experimental wounds. Varma S, Lumb WV, Johnson LW, Ferguson HL. Am J Vet Res; 1981 Apr; 42(4):571-4. PubMed ID: 6277212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Polypropylene suture in esophageal and gastrointestinal operations. Orringer MB, Appleman HD, Argenta L, Bove E, Cimmino V. Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1977 Jan; 144(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 831296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]