These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
193 related items for PubMed ID: 11298315
1. Localization of mandibular changes in patients with class II division 1 malocclusions treated with twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis. Singh GD, Clark WJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):419-25. PubMed ID: 11298315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated using Twin Block appliances: finite-element scaling analysis. Singh GD, Clark WJ. Eur J Orthod; 2003 Jun; 25(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 12831211 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bimaxillary morphometry of patients with class II division 1 malocclusion treated with twin block appliances. Singh GD, Hodge MR. Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):402-9. PubMed ID: 12401048 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Mandibular morphology in subjects with Class III malocclusions: Finite-element morphometry. Singh GD, McNamara JA, Lozanoff S. Angle Orthod; 1998 Oct; 68(5):409-18. PubMed ID: 9770098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Finite-element morphometry of soft tissue morphology in subjects with untreated Class III malocclusions. Singh GD, McNamara JA, Lozanoff S. Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 10371426 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the twin block appliance. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jul; 118(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 10893470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Morphometry of the mandible in prepubertal craniofacial microsomia patients following an inverted L osteotomy. Singh GD, Hay AD. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999 Jul; 14(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 10686847 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment. Serbesis-Tsarudis C, Pancherz H. Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationship between bilateral condylar bone change and mandibular morphology: a study using morphometry. Alkhamrah B, Yamada K, Yamaki M, Ali IM, Hanada K. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002 Sep; 17(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 12353938 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphometric analyses of the mandible in prepubertal craniofacial microsomia patients treated with an inverted-L osteotomy. Cerajewska TL, Singh GD. Clin Anat; 2002 Mar; 15(2):100-7. PubMed ID: 11877787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A cephalometric analysis of six Twin Block patients. A study of mandibular (body and ramus) growth and development. Stangl DP. Funct Orthod; 1997 Mar; 14(2):4-6, 8-14, 17-9 passim. PubMed ID: 9610277 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of treatments with the Forsus fatigue resistant device in relation to skeletal maturity: a cephalometric and magnetic resonance imaging study. Aras A, Ada E, Saracoğlu H, Gezer NS, Aras I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):616-25. PubMed ID: 22051481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, George C, Kaczynski R. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]