These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

325 related items for PubMed ID: 11303930

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Amplitude mapping and phoneme recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
    Zeng FG, Galvin JJ.
    Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 10037066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Speech recognition by normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners as a function of intensity resolution.
    Loizou PC, Dorman M, Poroy O, Spahr T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Nov; 108(5 Pt 1):2377-87. PubMed ID: 11108378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for normal-hearing listeners and patients with cochlear implants.
    Dorman MF, Loizou PC.
    Am J Otol; 1997 Nov; 18(6 Suppl):S113-4. PubMed ID: 9391623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
    Friesen LM, Shannon RV, Baskent D, Wang X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1150-63. PubMed ID: 11519582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The identification of consonants and vowels by cochlear implant patients using a 6-channel continuous interleaved sampling processor and by normal-hearing subjects using simulations of processors with two to nine channels.
    Dorman MF, Loizou PC.
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):162-6. PubMed ID: 9562538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Recognition of time-distorted sentences by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Fu QJ, Galvin JJ, Wang X.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):379-84. PubMed ID: 11206166
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
    Fu QJ, Nogaki G.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of dynamic range and amplitude mapping on phoneme recognition in Nucleus-22 cochlear implant users.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    Ear Hear; 2000 Jun; 21(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 10890731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B, Pok SM, Baumgartner WD, Deutsch WA, Schmid K.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Frequency mapping in cochlear implants.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):339-48. PubMed ID: 12195176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Interactions between unsupervised learning and the degree of spectral mismatch on short-term perceptual adaptation to spectrally shifted speech.
    Li T, Galvin JJ, Fu QJ.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):238-49. PubMed ID: 19194293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Fu QJ, Shannon RV.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1889-900. PubMed ID: 10089611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Minimum spectral contrast needed for vowel identification by normal hearing and cochlear implant listeners.
    Loizou PC, Poroy O.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1619-27. PubMed ID: 11572371
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor.
    Fishman KE, Shannon RV, Slattery WH.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1997 Oct; 40(5):1201-15. PubMed ID: 9328890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.