These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

150 related items for PubMed ID: 11304820

  • 21. Humphrey Matrix perimetry in optic nerve and chiasmal disorders: comparison with Humphrey SITA standard 24-2.
    Huang CQ, Carolan J, Redline D, Taravati P, Woodward KR, Johnson CA, Wall M, Keltner JL.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 18326712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Sensitivity of Swedish interactive threshold algorithm compared with standard full threshold algorithm in Humphrey visual field testing.
    Sekhar GC, Naduvilath TJ, Lakkai M, Jayakumar AJ, Pandi GT, Mandal AK, Honavar SG.
    Ophthalmology; 2000 Jul; 107(7):1303-8. PubMed ID: 10889102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH, Iwase A, Ohno Y, Kitazawa Y, Chauhan BC.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Reproducibility of visual field end point criteria for standard automated perimetry, full-threshold, and Swedish interactive thresholding algorithm strategies: diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Bourne RR, Jahanbakhsh K, Boden C, Zangwill LM, Hoffmann EM, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, Sample PA.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 144(6):908-913. PubMed ID: 17919445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of Three Visual Field Tests in Children: Frequency Doubling Test, 24-2 and 30-2 SITA Perimetry.
    Han S, Baek SH, Kim US.
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 32(5):647-650. PubMed ID: 27404791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. A new rapid threshold algorithm for short-wavelength automated perimetry.
    Bengtsson B.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1388-94. PubMed ID: 12601072
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Clinical evaluation of SITA: a new family of perimetric testing strategies.
    Shirato S, Inoue R, Fukushima K, Suzuki Y.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1999 Jan; 237(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 9951638
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. 24-2 SITA Standard versus 24-2 SITA Faster in Perimetry-Naive Normal Subjects.
    Costa VP, Zangalli CS, Jammal AA, Medeiros FA, Miyazaki JVMK, Perez V, Nardi Boscaroli ML, Schimiti RB.
    Ophthalmol Glaucoma; 2023 Jan; 6(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 35985477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC.
    Bengtsson B, Heijl A.
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 1999 Apr; 77(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 10321523
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.