These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

154 related items for PubMed ID: 11313732

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.
    Abreu M, Mol A, Ludlow JB.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
    Hintze H, Wenzel A.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. In vitro comparison of four different dental X-ray films and direct digital radiography for proximal caries detection.
    Alkurt MT, Peker I, Bala O, Altunkaynak B.
    Oper Dent; 2007 Jan; 32(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 17910228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sensitometric and clinical evaluation of a new F-speed dental X-ray film.
    Syriopoulos K, Velders XL, Sanderink GC, van Der Stelt PF.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 11175272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Extraoral imaging for proximal caries detection: Bitewings vs scanogram.
    Khan EA, Tyndall DA, Caplan D.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Dec; 98(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 15583548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A sensitometric comparison of four dental X-ray films and their diagnostic accuracy.
    Svenson B, Welander U, Shi XQ, Stamatakis H, Tronje G.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1997 Jul; 26(4):230-5. PubMed ID: 9442614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT).
    Abreu Júnior M, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Ludlow JB, Phillips C.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of sensitometric and diagnostic performance of two films.
    White SC, Yoon DC.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Jun; 21(6):530-2, 534, 536 passim. PubMed ID: 11199671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro comparison of Kodak Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus, and Agfa M2 Comfort dental x-ray films for the detection of caries.
    Hintze H, Christoffersen L, Wenzel A.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Feb; 81(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 8665322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.