These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
241 related items for PubMed ID: 11328758
1. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Spry PG, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11328758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma. Artes PH, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Usefulness of frequency-doubling technology for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral field loss. Fan X, Wu LL, Ma ZZ, Xiao GG, Liu F. Ophthalmology; 2010 Aug; 117(8):1530-7, 1537.e1-2. PubMed ID: 20466428 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups. Murata H, Tomidokoro A, Matsuo H, Tomita G, Araie M. J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Relationship of SITA and full-threshold standard perimetry to frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma. Boden C, Pascual J, Medeiros FA, Aihara M, Weinreb RN, Sample PA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2433-9. PubMed ID: 15980232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Repeatability of automated perimetry: a comparison between standard automated perimetry with stimulus size III and V, matrix, and motion perimetry. Wall M, Woodward KR, Doyle CK, Artes PH. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 50(2):974-9. PubMed ID: 18952921 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency doubling perimetry in neuro-ophthalmic disorders: a comparison with conventional automated perimetry. Wall M, Neahring RK, Woodward KR. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Apr; 43(4):1277-83. PubMed ID: 11923276 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Frequency-doubling perimetry: comparison with standard automated perimetry to detect glaucoma. Leeprechanon N, Giangiacomo A, Fontana H, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 Feb; 143(2):263-271. PubMed ID: 17178091 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Mar; 43(3):709-15. PubMed ID: 11867588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Detectability of glaucomatous changes using SAP, FDT, flicker perimetry, and OCT. Nomoto H, Matsumoto C, Takada S, Hashimoto S, Arimura E, Okuyama S, Shimomura Y. J Glaucoma; 2009 Feb; 18(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 19225357 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma. Clement CI, Goldberg I, Healey PR, Graham S. Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]