These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
241 related items for PubMed ID: 11328758
21. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Bozkurt B, Yilmaz PT, Irkec M. J Glaucoma; 2008 Apr; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of diabetes on glaucoma screening using frequency-doubling perimetry. Realini T, Lai MQ, Barber L. Ophthalmology; 2004 Nov; 111(11):2133-6. PubMed ID: 15522382 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients. Horn FK, Wakili N, Jünemann AM, Korth M. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Frequency-doubling technology: searching for the optimum diagnostic criteria for glaucoma. Ferreras A, Larrosa JM, Polo V, Pajarín AB, Mayoral F, Honrubia FM. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 Feb; 85(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 17244214 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Frequency doubling perimetry and the detection of eye disease in the community. Cioffi GA, Mansberger S, Spry P, Johnson C, Van Buskirk EM. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2000 Feb; 98():195-9; discussion 199-202. PubMed ID: 11190023 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Repeatability of frequency doubling technology perimetry (20-1 screening program) and the effect of pupillary dilatation on interpretation. Parikh R, Muliyil J, George R, Bhat S, Thomas R. Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 15(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18300088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing multifocal VEP and standard automated perimetry in high-risk ocular hypertension and early glaucoma. Fortune B, Demirel S, Zhang X, Hood DC, Patterson E, Jamil A, Mansberger SL, Cioffi GA, Johnson CA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1173-80. PubMed ID: 17325161 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry for detection of the development of visual field defects in glaucoma suspect eyes: a prospective study. Liu S, Yu M, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Lam DS, Leung CK. JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 24177945 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling technology perimetry and optical coherence tomography measurement of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in both normal and ocular hypertensive subjects. Mastropasqua L, Brusini P, Carpineto P, Ciancaglini M, Di Antonio L, Zeppieri MW, Parisi L. J Glaucoma; 2006 Aug; 15(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 16865011 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Long-term fluctuation of standard automatic perimetry, pulsar perimetry and frequency-doubling technology in early glaucoma diagnosis. Gonzalez-Hernandez M, de la Rosa MG, de la Vega RR, Hernandez-Vidal A. Ophthalmic Res; 2007 Aug; 39(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 17952009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Visual function-specific perimetry for indirect comparison of different ganglion cell populations in glaucoma. Sample PA, Bosworth CF, Blumenthal EZ, Girkin C, Weinreb RN. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 41(7):1783-90. PubMed ID: 10845599 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of cataract on the results of frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Tanna AP, Abraham C, Lai J, Shen J. Ophthalmology; 2004 Aug; 111(8):1504-7. PubMed ID: 15288979 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Automated flicker perimetry in glaucoma using Octopus 311: a comparative study with the Humphrey Matrix. Matsumoto C, Takada S, Okuyama S, Arimura E, Hashimoto S, Shimomura Y. Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Apr; 84(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 16637839 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. II. A prospective comparison of frequency doubling perimetry, the GDx nerve fibre analyser and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients. Jansonius NM, Heeg GP. Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 Jun; 87(4):429-32. PubMed ID: 18652580 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Frequency doubling technology for earlier detection of functional damage in standard automated perimetry-normal hemifield in glaucoma with low-to-normal pressure. Nakagawa S, Murata H, Saito H, Nakahara H, Mataki N, Tomidokoro A, Iwase A, Araie M. J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21543995 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Test-retest variability for standard automated perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry in diabetic patients. Bengtsson B, Hellgren KJ, Agardh E. Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 17935606 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma. Leeprechanon N, Giaconi JA, Manassakorn A, Hoffman D, Caprioli J. Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]