These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

389 related items for PubMed ID: 11333049

  • 1. Validation by serial standardized testing of a new rate-responsive pacemaker sensor based on variations in myocardial contractility.
    Clémenty J, Kobeissi A, Garrigue S, Jaïs P, Le Métayer P, Haïssaguerre M.
    Europace; 2001 Apr; 3(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 11333049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A blended sensor restores chronotropic response more favorably than an accelerometer alone in pacemaker patients: the LIFE study results.
    Coman J, Freedman R, Koplan BA, Reeves R, Santucci P, Stolen KQ, Kraus SM, Meyer TE, LIFE Study Results.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Nov; 31(11):1433-42. PubMed ID: 18950301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Is local myocardial contractility related to endocardial acceleration signals detected by a transvenous pacing lead?
    Bongiorni MG, Soldati E, Arena G, Quirino G, Vernazza F, Bernasconi A, Garberoglio B.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1682-8. PubMed ID: 8945024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Dual chamber rate responsive pacing and chronotropic insufficiency. Comparison of double and respiratory sensors].
    Lascault G, Pansard Y, Scholl JM, Abraham P, Dupuis JM, Victor J, Copie X, Alonso C, Sarrazin E.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 2001 Mar; 94(3):190-5. PubMed ID: 11338253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Rate responsive pacemakers: a rapid assessment protocol.
    Shaber JD, Fisher JD, Ramachandra I, Gonzalez C, Rosenberg L, Ferrick KJ, Gross JN, Kim SG.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Feb; 31(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 18233972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Peak endocardial acceleration-based clinical testing of the "BEST" DDDR pacemaker. European PEA Clinical Investigation Group.
    Langenfeld H, Krein A, Kirstein M, Binner L.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 2):2187-91. PubMed ID: 9825316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Adequacy of of pacemakers responsive to the volume-minute ventilation rate in heart transplantation patients].
    Sant'Anna JR, Castro I, Lima LL, Reis A, Kalil RA, Prates PR, Lucchese FA, Halperin C, Pereira E, Rodrigues R.
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 1995 Jun; 64(6):547-52. PubMed ID: 8561675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Determination of the optimal atrioventricular delay in DDD pacing. Comparison between echo and peak endocardial acceleration measurements.
    Ritter P, Padeletti L, Gillio-Meina L, Gaggini G.
    Europace; 1999 Apr; 1(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 11228855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.