These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

326 related items for PubMed ID: 11335190

  • 1. Annoyance from transportation noise: relationships with exposure metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals.
    Miedema HM, Oudshoorn CG.
    Environ Health Perspect; 2001 Apr; 109(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 11335190
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Relationship between exposure to multiple noise sources and noise annoyance.
    Miedema HM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):949-57. PubMed ID: 15376661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Noise annoyance from stationary sources: relationships with exposure metric day-evening-night level (DENL) and their confidence intervals.
    Miedema HM, Vos H.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Jul; 116(1):334-43. PubMed ID: 15295994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Acoustical model and theory for predicting effects of environmental noise on people.
    Kryter KD.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3707-21. PubMed ID: 19507953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A survey on exposure-response relationships for road, rail, and aircraft noise annoyance: Differences between continuous and intermittent noise.
    Brink M, Schäffer B, Vienneau D, Foraster M, Pieren R, Eze IC, Cajochen C, Probst-Hensch N, Röösli M, Wunderli JM.
    Environ Int; 2019 Apr; 125():277-290. PubMed ID: 30731377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Testing of the European Union exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model for annoyance due to transportation noises: The need of revised exposure-response relationships and annoyance equivalents model.
    Gille LA, Marquis-Favre C, Morel J.
    Environ Int; 2016 Sep; 94():83-94. PubMed ID: 27223699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A first-principles model for estimating the prevalence of annoyance with aircraft noise exposure.
    Fidell S, Mestre V, Schomer P, Berry B, Gjestland T, Vallet M, Reid T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):791-806. PubMed ID: 21877795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Annoyance from Road Traffic, Trains, Airplanes and from Total Environmental Noise Levels.
    Ragettli MS, Goudreau S, Plante C, Perron S, Fournier M, Smargiassi A.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2015 Dec 29; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 26729143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Investigation of the relationship between aircraft noise and community annoyance in China.
    Guoqing D, Xiaoyi L, Xiang S, Zhengguang L, Qili L.
    Noise Health; 2012 Dec 29; 14(57):52-7. PubMed ID: 22517304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Role of community tolerance level (CTL) in predicting the prevalence of the annoyance of road and rail noise.
    Schomer P, Mestre V, Fidell S, Berry B, Gjestland T, Vallet M, Reid T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Apr 29; 131(4):2772-86. PubMed ID: 22501056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Information-criterion based selection of models for community noise annoyance.
    Keith Wilson D, Valente D, Nykaza ET, Pettit CL.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar 29; 133(3):EL195-201. PubMed ID: 23464128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Representative Exposure-Annoyance Relationships Due to Transportation Noises in Japan.
    Yokoshima S, Morinaga M, Tsujimura S, Shimoyama K, Morihara T.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Oct 18; 18(20):. PubMed ID: 34682680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Traffic noise annoyance in the LIFE-adult study in Germany: Exposure-response relationships and a comparison to the WHO curves.
    Romero Starke K, Schubert M, Kaboth P, Gerlach J, Hegewald J, Reusche M, Friedemann D, Zülke A, Riedel-Heller SG, Zeeb H, Seidler A.
    Environ Res; 2023 Jul 01; 228():115815. PubMed ID: 37003550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Children's annoyance reactions to aircraft and road traffic noise.
    van Kempen EE, van Kamp I, Stellato RK, Lopez-Barrio I, Haines MM, Nilsson ME, Clark C, Houthuijs D, Brunekreef B, Berglund B, Stansfeld SA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Feb 01; 125(2):895-904. PubMed ID: 19206866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. WHO Environmental Noise Guidelines for the European Region: A Systematic Review on Environmental Noise and Annoyance.
    Guski R, Schreckenberg D, Schuemer R.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Dec 08; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 29292769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Community reaction to aircraft noise: time-of-day penalty and tradeoff between levels of overflights.
    Miedema HM, Vos H, de Jong RG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun 08; 107(6):3245-53. PubMed ID: 10875369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Relationship of Transportation Noise and Annoyance for Two Metropolitan Cities in Korea: Population Based Study.
    Sung JH, Lee J, Park SJ, Sim CS.
    PLoS One; 2016 Jun 08; 11(12):e0169035. PubMed ID: 28005976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Short-Term Annoyance Due to Night-Time Road, Railway, and Air Traffic Noise: Role of the Noise Source, the Acoustical Metric, and Non-Acoustical Factors.
    Weidenfeld S, Sanok S, Fimmers R, Puth MT, Aeschbach D, Elmenhorst EM.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Apr 27; 18(9):. PubMed ID: 33925579
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Exposure-response relationships for transportation noise.
    Miedema HM, Vos H.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Dec 27; 104(6):3432-45. PubMed ID: 9857505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Annoyance caused by simultaneous impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds: a quantitative model.
    Vos J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun 27; 91(6):3330-45. PubMed ID: 1619113
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.