These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 11342984

  • 1. Three-dimensional MR imaging of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications.
    Nakahara H, Namba K, Fukami A, Watanabe R, Maeda Y, Furusawa H, Matsu T, Akiyama F, Nakagawa H, Ifuku H, Nakahara M, Tamura S.
    Breast Cancer; 2001; 8(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 11342984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging in patients with BI-RADS 3-5 microcalcifications.
    Cilotti A, Iacconi C, Marini C, Moretti M, Mazzotta D, Traino C, Naccarato AG, Piagneri V, Giaconi C, Bevilacqua G, Bartolozzi C.
    Radiol Med; 2007 Mar; 112(2):272-86. PubMed ID: 17361370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value?
    Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, Oestmann JW.
    Radiology; 1998 Jun; 207(3):675-81. PubMed ID: 9609890
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Breast microcalcifications studied with 3D contrast-enhanced high-field magnetic resonance imaging: more accuracy in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Trecate G, Tess JD, Vergnaghi D, Bergonzi S, De Simone T, Mariani G, Musumeci R.
    Tumori; 2002 Jun; 88(3):224-33. PubMed ID: 12195761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The diagnostic sensitivity of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and breast-specific gamma imaging in women with calcified and non-calcified DCIS.
    Kim JS, Lee SM, Cha ES.
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):668-75. PubMed ID: 24043881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Contrast-enhanced breast MRI in patients with suspicious microcalcifications on mammography: results of a multicenter trial.
    Bazzocchi M, Zuiani C, Panizza P, Del Frate C, Soldano F, Isola M, Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Simonetti G, Lattanzio V, Del Maschio A.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jun; 186(6):1723-32. PubMed ID: 16714666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Categorization of non-mass-like breast lesions detected by MRI.
    Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Higa K, Tsunoda Y, Ogawa T, Abe S, Ozaki S, Sakamoto M, Tsuruhara T, Kawano N, Suzuki T, Yamashiro N, Fukuma E.
    Breast Cancer; 2008 Jun; 15(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 18224381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast.
    Gökalp G, Topal U.
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. MRI and comparison mammography: a worthy diagnostic alliance for breast microcalcifications?
    Brnic D, Brnic D, Simundic I, Vanjaka Rogosic L, Tadic T.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Apr; 57(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 25995311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Diagnostic value of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast].
    Winnekendonk G, Krug B, Warm M, Göhring UJ, Mallmann P, Lackner K.
    Rofo; 2004 May; 176(5):688-93. PubMed ID: 15122467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Breast microcalcifications as type descriptors to stratify risk of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10665 cases with special focus on round/punctate microcalcifications.
    Rominger M, Wisgickl C, Timmesfeld N.
    Rofo; 2012 Dec; 184(12):1144-52. PubMed ID: 22923222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in probably benign (BI-RADS category 3) microcalcifications of the breast.
    Linda A, Zuiani C, Londero V, Di Gaetano E, Dal Col A, Girometti R, Bazzocchi M.
    Radiol Med; 2014 Jun; 119(6):393-9. PubMed ID: 24297595
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications.
    Uematsu T, Kasami M, Yuen S.
    Breast Cancer; 2008 Jun; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging.
    Strobel K, Schrading S, Hansen NL, Barabasch A, Kuhl CK.
    Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?
    Akita A, Tanimoto A, Jinno H, Kameyama K, Kuribayashi S.
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Sep; 19(9):2089-96. PubMed ID: 19350244
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Breast lesion diagnosis: integrating pathology and radiology].
    Zonderland HM, van de Vijver MJ, Visser M.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011 Sep; 155(18):A2967. PubMed ID: 21466724
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.