These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
236 related items for PubMed ID: 11357563
1. Diagnostic accuracy of intraoral film and direct digital images for detection of simulated recurrent decay. Nair MK, Ludlow JB, May KN, Nair UP, Johnson MP, Close JM. Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11357563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Tuned aperture computed tomography and detection of recurrent caries. Nair MK, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, May K. Caries Res; 1998; 32(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 9438568 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography. Nair MK, Tyndall DA, Ludlow JB, May K, Ye F. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study. Abu El-Ela WH, Farid MM, Mostafa MS. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016 Mar; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Svanaes DB, Moystad A, Larheim TA. Caries Res; 2000 Mar; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of direct digital and conventional radiography for the detection of proximal surface caries in the mixed dentition. Uprichard KK, Potter BJ, Russell CM, Schafer TE, Adair S, Weller RN. Pediatr Dent; 2000 Mar; 22(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 10730280 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Film tomography compared with film and digital bitewing radiography for proximal caries detection. Peker I, Toraman Alkurt M, Altunkaynak B. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2007 Dec; 36(8):495-9. PubMed ID: 18033947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of different background lighting conditions on diagnostic performance of digital and film images. Cederberg RA, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Shulman JD. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Sep; 27(5):293-7. PubMed ID: 9879219 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques. Murat S, Kamburoğlu K, Isayev A, Kurşun S, Yüksel S. Oper Dent; 2013 Sep; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Two- and three-dimensional imaging modalities for the detection of caries. A comparison between film, digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography (TACT). Abreu Júnior M, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Ludlow JB, Phillips C. Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 May; 28(3):152-7. PubMed ID: 10740469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]