These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. An employer's exclusion of coverage for contraceptive drugs is not per se sex discrimination. Lidge EF. Temple Law Rev; 2003; 76(3):533-77. PubMed ID: 16514770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Applicability of ADA non-discrimination principles to self-insured health plans: do "AIDS caps" violate the law? Morgan PJ. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1994 Jan; 11(1):221-51. PubMed ID: 10172301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Circuit courts clash over HIV in the workplace. AIDS Policy Law; 1997 Sep 19; 12(17):suppl 1-4. PubMed ID: 11364687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ADA applies to insurance discrimination, judge rules. AIDS Policy Law; 1996 Dec 27; 11(22):2. PubMed ID: 11364064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sex discrimination or a hard pill for employers to swallow: examining the denial of contraceptive benefits in the wake of Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co. Korland L. Case West Reserve Law Rev; 2002 Dec 27; 53(2):531-67. PubMed ID: 16506335 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. EEOC says temporary workers qualify for ADA protection. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. AIDS Policy Law; 1998 Jan 23; 13(1):10-1. PubMed ID: 11364955 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]