These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Clinical assessment of dry laser-processed film versus traditional wet-processed film with computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. Krupinski EA. Acad Radiol; 1996 Oct; 3(10):855-8. PubMed ID: 8923905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Optical density changes in dry-processed films. Al Khalifah K, Brindhaban A, Al Baloul G, Al Bather F, Abdulgafoor M. Radiol Technol; 2007 Oct; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17848529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of films processed in automatic and manual processors. Thunthy KH, Weinberg R. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1980 Nov; 50(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 6935603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Problems with film processing in medical X-ray imaging in Lithuania. Sniureviciute M, Adliene D. Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Oct; 114(1-3):260-3. PubMed ID: 15933118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]