These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

147 related items for PubMed ID: 11392881

  • 1. Endocervical status is not predictive of the incidence of cervical cancer in the years after negative smears.
    Bos AB, van Ballegooijen M, van den Akker-van Marle ME, Hanselaar AG, van Oortmarssen GJ, Habbema JD.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Jun; 115(6):851-5. PubMed ID: 11392881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. High-grade cervical abnormalities and cervical cancer in women following a negative Pap smear with and without an endocervical component: a cohort study with 10 years of follow-up.
    Sultana F, English DR, Simpson JA, Canfell K, Gertig DM, Saville M.
    Int J Cancer; 2014 Sep 01; 135(5):1213-9. PubMed ID: 24488882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Diagnostic value of endocervical curettage for detecting dysplastic lesions in women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) Papanicolaou smears.
    Poomtavorn Y, Suwannarurk K, Thaweekul Y, Maireang K.
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014 Sep 01; 15(8):3461-4. PubMed ID: 24870740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Outcome in women with no endocervical component on cervical cytology after treatment for high-grade cervical dysplasia.
    Huang A, Quinn M, Tan J.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Aug 01; 49(4):426-8. PubMed ID: 19694701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Loss to follow-up of cervical smears without endocervical columnar cells is not disturbing.
    Tacken MA, Braspenning JC, Mulder J, Hermens RP, Nelen WL, de Bakker DH, Grol RP.
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2006 Aug 01; 27(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 16550967
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A cytohistologic study of atypical glandular cells detected in cervical smears during cervical screening tests in Iran.
    Mood NI, Eftekhar Z, Haratian A, Saeedi L, Rahimi-Moghaddam P, Yarandi F.
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2006 Aug 01; 16(1):257-61. PubMed ID: 16445641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The detection of endocervical gland involvement by high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in smears prepared from endocervical brush specimens.
    Van Hoeven KH, Hanau CA, Hudock JA.
    Cytopathology; 1996 Oct 01; 7(5):310-5. PubMed ID: 8911754
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Improving the adequacy of Pap smears.
    Baker RM.
    Am Fam Physician; 1989 Jun 01; 39(6):109-14. PubMed ID: 2729036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [The significance of endocervical cells in cytologic smears on diagnosis of uterine cervix pathology].
    Matyjaszczyk J.
    Ginekol Pol; 1996 Mar 01; 67(3):135-9. PubMed ID: 8647506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Influence of endocervical status on the cytologic prediction of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Mitchell H, Medley G.
    Acta Cytol; 1992 Mar 01; 36(6):875-80. PubMed ID: 1449025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Risk of high-grade cervical dysplasia and gynaecological malignancies following the cytologic diagnosis of atypical endocervical cells of undetermined significance: a retrospective study of a state-wide screening population in Western Australia.
    Munro A, Williams V, Semmens J, Leung Y, Stewart CJ, Codde J, Spilsbury K, Steel N, Cohen P, O'leary P.
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun 01; 55(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 26044565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in cervical cytologic findings.
    Manetta A, Keefe K, Lin F, Ahdoot D, Kaleb V.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Apr 01; 180(4):883-8. PubMed ID: 10203656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Risk of cervical cancer after completed post-treatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: population based cohort study.
    Rebolj M, Helmerhorst T, Habbema D, Looman C, Boer R, van Rosmalen J, van Ballegooijen M.
    BMJ; 2012 Oct 31; 345():e6855. PubMed ID: 23117059
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of smears obtained by cervical scraping and an endocervical swab in the diagnosis of neoplastic disease of the uterine cervix.
    Johansen P, Arffmann E, Pallesen G.
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1979 Oct 31; 58(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 484218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Incidence and Clinical Significance of Atypical Glandular Cells of Undetermined Significance on Cervical Pap Smears.
    Al-Rayyan E, Rashed M, Maaita M, Qudah S, Taso O, Haddadin W.
    Gulf J Oncolog; 2019 May 31; 1(30):52-56. PubMed ID: 31242982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Risk of CIN2 in women with a pap test without endocervical cells vs. those with a negative pap test with endocervical cells: a cohort study with 4.5 years of follow-up.
    Giorgi Rossi P, Baiocchi D, Ciatto S, Endocervical Cell Italian Working Group of Cervical Cancer Screening Group.
    Acta Cytol; 2010 May 31; 54(3):265-71. PubMed ID: 20518409
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Frequency of cervical smear abnormalities within 3 years of normal cytology.
    Sawaya GF, Kerlikowske K, Lee NC, Gildengorin G, Washington AE.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug 31; 96(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 10908766
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.