These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
345 related items for PubMed ID: 11395527
1. Rapid palatal expansion in mixed dentition using a modified expander: a cephalometric investigation. Cozza P, Giancotti A, Petrosino A. J Orthod; 2001 Jun; 28(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 11395527 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dental and skeletal components of Class II open bite treatment with a modified Thurow appliance. Jacob HB, dos Santos-Pinto A, Buschang PH. Dental Press J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 19(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 24713556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Skeletal alterations associated with the use of bonded rapid maxillary expansion appliance. Rossi Md, Rossi Ad, Abrão J. Braz Dent J; 2011 Jun; 22(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 21861035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment. Cozza P, De Toffol L, Iacopini L. Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Sagittal and vertical effects of transverse sagittal maxillary expander (TSME) in three different malocclusion groups. Maspero C, Galbiati G, Giannini L, Farronato G. Prog Orthod; 2015 Apr 25; 16():6. PubMed ID: 25907431 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. An evaluation of the dentoskeletal effects of slow maxillary expansion from the mixed to the permanent dentition. Esenlik E, Rübendüz M. Aust Orthod J; 2015 May 25; 31(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26219141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. Sharma AK, Sachdev V, Singla A, Kirtaniya BC. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012 May 25; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances. Martins RP, da Rosa Martins JC, Martins LP, Buschang PH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec 25; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative evaluation of maxillary protraction with or without skeletal anchorage. Sar C, Arman-Özçırpıcı A, Uçkan S, Yazıcı AC. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May 25; 139(5):636-49. PubMed ID: 21536207 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]