These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

246 related items for PubMed ID: 11407769

  • 1. An electromyographic investigation of the first six months of progressive mandibular advancement of the Herbst appliance in adolescents.
    Leung DK, Hägg U.
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Jun; 71(3):177-84. PubMed ID: 11407769
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Muscular adaptation to gradual advancement of the mandible.
    Du X, Hägg U.
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Oct; 73(5):525-31. PubMed ID: 14580019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptations following mandibular forward positioning induced by the Herbst appliance.
    Hiyama S, Ono PT, Ishiwata Y, Kuroda T, McNamara JA.
    Angle Orthod; 2000 Dec; 70(6):442-53. PubMed ID: 11138648
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Changes in soft tissue profile and electromyographic activity after activator treatment.
    Erdem A, Kilic N, Eröz B.
    Aust Orthod J; 2009 Nov; 25(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 20043545
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
    Purkayastha SK, Rabie AB, Wong R.
    World J Orthod; 2008 Nov; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Treatment effects of the edgewise Herbst appliance: a cephalometric and tomographic investigation.
    VanLaecken R, Martin CA, Dischinger T, Razmus T, Ngan P.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):582-93. PubMed ID: 17110255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Long-term comparison of treatment outcome and stability of Class II patients treated with functional appliances versus bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Berger JL, Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, George C, Kaczynski R.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):451-64; quiz 516-7. PubMed ID: 15821690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Muscle response to the twin-block appliance: an electromyographic study of the masseter and anterior temporal muscles.
    Aggarwal P, Kharbanda OP, Mathur R, Duggal R, Parkash H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):405-14. PubMed ID: 10511668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effects of spring-loaded posterior bite-block appliance on masticatory muscles.
    Akkaya S, Haydar S, Bilir E.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 10935958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Condylar growth and mandibular positioning with stepwise vs maximum advancement.
    Hägg U, Rabie AB, Bendeus M, Wong RW, Wey MC, Du X, Peng J.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):525-36. PubMed ID: 18929270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Class II correction in patients treated with class II elastics and with fixed functional appliances: a comparative study.
    Nelson B, Hansen K, Hägg U.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Aug; 118(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 10935954
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Electromyography of the anterior temporalis and masseter muscles of owl monkeys (Aotus trivirgatus) and the function of the postorbital septum.
    Ross CF, Hylander WL.
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2000 Aug; 112(4):455-68. PubMed ID: 10918124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Herbst appliance therapy and temporomandibular joint disc position: a prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Aidar LA, Abrahão M, Yamashita HK, Dominguez GC.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Apr; 129(4):486-96. PubMed ID: 16627174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The mechanism of Class II correction during Herbst therapy in relation to the vertical jaw base relationship: a cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S, Pancherz H.
    Angle Orthod; 1997 Apr; 67(4):271-6. PubMed ID: 9267575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Effectiveness of incremental vs maximum bite advancement during Herbst appliance therapy in late adolescent and young adult patients.
    Amuk NG, Baysal A, Coskun R, Kurt G.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Jan; 155(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 30591165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Treatment effects of the mandibular anterior repositioning appliance on patients with Class II malocclusion.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V, Berger JL, Chermak DS, Kaczynski R, Simon ES, Haerian A.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Mar; 123(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 12637901
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Orthodontic treatment combined with mandibular distraction osteogenesis and changes in stomatognathic function.
    Maeda A, Soejima K, Ogura M, Ohmure H, Sugihara K, Miyawaki S.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Nov; 78(6):1125-32. PubMed ID: 18947288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 1. Hard tissue changes.
    Gill DS, Lee RT.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):465-72; quiz 517. PubMed ID: 15821691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mandibular incisor position changes in relation to amount of bite jumping during Herbst/multibracket appliance treatment: a radiographic-cephalometric study.
    Martin J, Pancherz H.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 19577147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of an occlusal stabilization splint and the mode of visual feedback on the activity balance between jaw-elevator muscles during isometric contraction.
    Lobbezoo F, van der Glas HW, van Kampen FM, Bosman F.
    J Dent Res; 1993 May; 72(5):876-82. PubMed ID: 8501285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.