These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

204 related items for PubMed ID: 11426166

  • 21. Biomechanical evaluation of an expandable cage in single-segment posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Bhatia NN, Lee KH, Bui CN, Luna M, Wahba GM, Lee TQ.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jan 15; 37(2):E79-85. PubMed ID: 21629171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.
    Mantell M, Cyriac M, Haines CM, Gudipally M, O'Brien JR.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Jan 15; 24(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 26384133
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A new stand-alone cervical anterior interbody fusion device: biomechanical comparison with established anterior cervical fixation devices.
    Scholz M, Reyes PM, Schleicher P, Sawa AG, Baek S, Kandziora F, Marciano FF, Crawford NR.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan 15; 34(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19139665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Biomechanical comparison of cervical interbody cage versus structural bone graft.
    Greene DL, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, Park SC, Crandall D.
    Spine J; 2003 Jan 15; 3(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 14589184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages.
    Wang M, Dalal S, Bagaria VB, McGrady LM, Rao RD.
    Spine J; 2007 Jan 15; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. MIS Expandable Interbody Spacers: A Literature Review and Biomechanical Comparison of an Expandable MIS TLIF With Conventional TLIF and ALIF.
    Cannestra AF, Peterson MD, Parker SR, Roush TF, Bundy JV, Turner AW.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Apr 15; 41 Suppl 8():S44-9. PubMed ID: 26825792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Biomechanical analysis of biodegradable interbody fusion cages augmented With poly(propylene glycol-co-fumaric acid).
    Kandziora F, Pflugmacher R, Kleemann R, Duda G, Wise DL, Trantolo DJ, Lewandrowski KU.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Aug 01; 27(15):1644-51. PubMed ID: 12163726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Primary stiffness of a modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with integrated screw fixation: cadaveric biomechanical study.
    Keiler A, Schmoelz W, Erhart S, Gnanalingham K.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Aug 01; 39(17):E994-E1000. PubMed ID: 24875958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. In vitro study of biomechanical behavior of anterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody instrumentation techniques.
    Niemeyer TK, Koriller M, Claes L, Kettler A, Werner K, Wilke HJ.
    Neurosurgery; 2006 Dec 01; 59(6):1271-6; discussion 1276-7. PubMed ID: 17277690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.
    Buttermann GR, Beaubien BP, Freeman AL, Stoll JE, Chappuis JL.
    Spine J; 2009 Jul 01; 9(7):564-73. PubMed ID: 19457722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.
    Tsitsopoulos PP, Serhan H, Voronov LI, Carandang G, Havey RM, Ghanayem AJ, Patwardhan AG.
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec 01; 25(8):E240-4. PubMed ID: 22362111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.
    Phillips FM, Voronov LI, Gaitanis IN, Carandang G, Havey RM, Patwardhan AG.
    Spine J; 2006 Dec 01; 6(6):714-22. PubMed ID: 17088203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine.
    Aghayev K, Doulgeris JJ, Gonzalez-Blohm SA, Eleraky M, Lee WE, Vrionis FD.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2014 Jan 01; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.