These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

266 related items for PubMed ID: 11455180

  • 1. Three-dimensional computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography of carotid bifurcation stenosis.
    Binaghi S, Maeder P, Uské A, Meuwly JY, Devuyst G, Meuli RA.
    Eur Neurol; 2001; 46(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 11455180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [An evaluation of the carotid bifurcation and of the intracranial circle by angio-spiral computed tomography].
    Bozzao A, Floris R, Villani A, Varrucciu V, Baviera ME, Simonetti G.
    Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 9717538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
    Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Saba L, Cavallo Marincola B, Zini C, Cartocci G, Di Mare L, Catalano C, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Korn A, Bender B, Brodoefel H, Hauser TK, Danz S, Ernemann U, Thomas C.
    Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Time-of-flight MR angiography of carotid artery stenosis: does a flow void represent severe stenosis?
    Nederkoorn PJ, van der Graaf Y, Eikelboom BC, van der Lugt A, Bartels LW, Mali WP.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2002 Mar; 23(10):1779-84. PubMed ID: 12427639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Sundgren PC, Sundén P, Lindgren A, Lanke J, Holtås S, Larsson EM.
    Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Evaluating non-invasive medical imaging for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis with ischemic cerebrovascular disease.
    Lu X, Zhang W, Gui Q, Yu M, Guo Y.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2003 Jan; 116(1):112-5. PubMed ID: 12667401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Nederkoorn PJ, Elgersma OE, Mali WP, Eikelboom BC, Kappelle LJ, van der Graaf Y.
    J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Non-invasive assessment of epiaortic vessels. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography with gadolinium, spiral computerized tomography angiography, and digital angiography].
    Bozzao A, Floris R, Pocek M, Fasoli F, Garaci FG, Simonetti G.
    Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 101(1-2):48-53. PubMed ID: 11360753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prospective evaluation of carotid artery stenosis: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography and spiral CT angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    Alvarez-Linera J, Benito-León J, Escribano J, Campollo J, Gesto R.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003 May; 24(5):1012-9. PubMed ID: 12748115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Preliminary experience with MRA in evaluating the degree of carotid stenosis and plaque morphology using high-resolution sequences after gadofosveset trisodium (Vasovist) administration: comparison with CTA and DSA.
    Anzidei M, Napoli A, Geiger D, Cavallo Marincola B, Zini C, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Catalano C, Passariello R.
    Radiol Med; 2010 Jun; 115(4):634-47. PubMed ID: 20177976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
    D'Onofrio M, Mansueto G, Faccioli N, Guarise A, Tamellini P, Bogina G, Pozzi Mucelli R.
    Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparative study of magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography, duplex ultrasound examination with surgical and histological findings of atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation disease.
    Liberopoulos K, Kaponis A, Kokkinis K, Pagratis N, Nicolakopoulou Z, Douskou M, Stringaris K, Clonaris C, Balas P.
    Int Angiol; 1996 Jun; 15(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8803637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Carotid artery stenosis: prospective comparison of CT, three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR, and conventional angiography.
    Randoux B, Marro B, Koskas F, Duyme M, Sahel M, Zouaoui A, Marsault C.
    Radiology; 2001 Jul; 220(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 11425993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.