These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

85 related items for PubMed ID: 1145982

  • 21. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA, Black JM, Koch DB.
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Cochlear implants: the view from the brain.
    Middlebrooks JC, Bierer JA, Snyder RL.
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2005 Aug; 15(4):488-93. PubMed ID: 16009544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. A new approach to the cochlear implant.
    Douek E.
    Proc R Soc Med; 1977 Jun; 70(6):379-83. PubMed ID: 877107
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparisons between neural response imaging thresholds, electrically evoked auditory reflex thresholds and most comfortable loudness levels in CII bionic ear users with HiResolution sound processing strategies.
    Han DM, Chen XQ, Zhao XT, Kong Y, Li YX, Liu S, Liu B, Mo LY.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):732-5. PubMed ID: 16012035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Effects of phase duration and pulse rate on loudness and pitch percepts in the first auditory midbrain implant patients: Comparison to cochlear implant and auditory brainstem implant results.
    Lim HH, Lenarz T, Joseph G, Battmer RD, Patrick JF, Lenarz M.
    Neuroscience; 2008 Jun 12; 154(1):370-80. PubMed ID: 18384971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. FMRI evidence for activation of multiple cortical regions in the primary auditory cortex of deaf subjects users of multichannel cochlear implants.
    Seghier ML, Boëx C, Lazeyras F, Sigrist A, Pelizzone M.
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jan 12; 15(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 15238446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. [Long-term results of multi-channel stimulation of the cochlear nucleus with auditory brain stem prostheses].
    Marangos N, Laszig R, Sollmann WP.
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1997 Jan 12; 147(10):259-63. PubMed ID: 9324869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Auditory brainstem activity and development evoked by apical versus basal cochlear implant electrode stimulation in children.
    Gordon KA, Papsin BC, Harrison RV.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Aug 12; 118(8):1671-84. PubMed ID: 17588811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Hearing conservation surgery using the Hybrid-L electrode. Results from the first clinical trial at the Medical University of Hannover.
    Lenarz T, Stöver T, Buechner A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Patrick J, Pesch J.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Aug 12; 14 Suppl 1():22-31. PubMed ID: 19390172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Electromagnetic stimulation of the auditory system: effects and side-effects.
    Counter SA.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Aug 12; 37():1-32. PubMed ID: 8210963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Assessing the pitch structure associated with multiple rates and places for cochlear implant users.
    Stohl JS, Throckmorton CS, Collins LM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb 12; 123(2):1043-53. PubMed ID: 18247906
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Experiences with the implantation of a multichannel electrode in the acoustic nerve].
    Naumann HH, Zwicker E, Scherer H, Seifert J, Leysieffer H, Zollner M.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1986 Mar 12; 65(3):118-22. PubMed ID: 3754920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Pitch perception in patients with a multi-channel cochlear implant using various pulses width.
    Aronson L, Rosenhouse J, Podoshin L, Rosenhouse G, Zanutto SB.
    Med Prog Technol; 1994 Mar 12; 20(1-2):43-51. PubMed ID: 7968864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Electrical stimulation of the human cochlea and the flexible multichannel intracochlear electrode.
    Jako GJ.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Feb 12; 11(1):235-40. PubMed ID: 662350
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Present status and future development of the cochlear prosthesis.
    Michelson RP, Merzenich MM, Schindler RA, Schindler DN.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1975 Feb 12; 84(4 Pt 1):494-8. PubMed ID: 1155884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. A cochlear prosthesis: further clinical observations; preliminary results of physiological studies.
    Michelson RP, Merzenich MM, Pettit CR, Schindler RA.
    Laryngoscope; 1973 Jul 12; 83(7):1116-22. PubMed ID: 4719358
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Initial results with simultaneous analog and pulsatile stimulation of the cochlea.
    von Wallenberg EL, Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ.
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jul 12; 469():140-9. PubMed ID: 2356720
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Investigations towards an artificial cochlea.
    Hochmair ES, Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Burian K.
    Int J Artif Organs; 1979 Sep 12; 2(5):255-61. PubMed ID: 582589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. [Refractory recovery function of electrical auditory on the survival auditory nerve in cochlear implant recipients].
    Xi X, Ji F, Han DY, Huang DL, Hong MD, Yang WY.
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2004 Feb 12; 39(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 15195587
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Development and evaluation of an improved cochlear implant electrode design for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Adunka O, Kiefer J, Unkelbach MH, Lehnert T, Gstoettner W.
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jul 12; 114(7):1237-41. PubMed ID: 15235353
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.