These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


648 related items for PubMed ID: 11465256

  • 1. Original sagittal split osteotomy revisited for mandibular distraction.
    Choi JY, Hwang KG, Baek SH, Lee JH, Kim TW, Kim MJ, Chang YI.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 29(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 11465256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Distraction osteogenesis of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia].
    Yang ZC, Wang X, Yi B, Li ZL, Liang C, Wang XX.
    Zhonghua Zheng Xing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 25(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 19558162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a prospective clinical trial comparing inferior alveolar nerve function and complications.
    Ow A, Cheung LK.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Aug; 39(8):756-60. PubMed ID: 20452186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for advancement of the retrognathic mandible: a review of the literature.
    Schreuder WH, Jansma J, Bierman MW, Vissink A.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Feb; 36(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 17270397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
    Vos MD, Baas EM, de Lange J, Bierenbroodspot F.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 38(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18977640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Long term stability of mandibular advancement procedures: bilateral sagittal split osteotomy versus distraction osteogenesis.
    Baas EM, Pijpe J, de Lange J.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 22137334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Application of distraction osteogenesis in correction of hemifacial microsomia].
    Wang X, Lin Y, Yi B.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2001 Mar 10; 81(5):259-62. PubMed ID: 11798882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Theoretical considerations for the surgical correction of mandibular deformity in hemifacial microsomia patients using multifocal distraction osteogenesis.
    Kunz C, Brauchli L, Moehle T, Rahn B, Hammer B.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Mar 10; 61(3):364-8. PubMed ID: 12618978
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-lasting neurosensory disturbance following advancement of the retrognathic mandible: distraction osteogenesis versus bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Wijbenga JG, Verlinden CR, Jansma J, Becking AG, Stegenga B.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul 10; 38(7):719-25. PubMed ID: 19394196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Subjective alveolar nerve function after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy or distraction osteogenesis of mandible.
    Baas EM, Horsthuis RB, de Lange J.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr 10; 70(4):910-8. PubMed ID: 21763047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better?
    Ow AT, Cheung LK.
    Ann R Australas Coll Dent Surg; 2008 Jun 10; 19():55-7. PubMed ID: 19728632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Skeletal stability and complications of bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular distraction osteogenesis: an evidence-based review.
    Ow A, Cheung LK.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Nov 10; 67(11):2344-53. PubMed ID: 19837301
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.