These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1028 related items for PubMed ID: 11465298
1. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids. Bosman AJ, Snik AF, van der Pouw CT, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. Audiology; 2001; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation. Priwin C, Stenfelt S, Granström G, Tjellström A, Håkansson B. Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Bone-anchored hearing aid system application for unilateral congenital conductive hearing impairment: audiometric results. Kunst SJ, Leijendeckers JM, Mylanus EA, Hol MK, Snik AF, Cremers CW. Otol Neurotol; 2008 Jan; 29(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 18199951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome. Priwin C, Jönsson R, Hultcrantz M, Granström G. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle. Bosman AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. Int J Audiol; 2006 Aug; 45(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 17005485 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings. Hornsby BW, Ricketts TA. Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification. Lin LM, Bowditch S, Anderson MJ, May B, Cox KM, Niparko JK. Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The BAHA Softband. A new treatment for young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia. Hol MK, Cremers CW, Coppens-Schellekens W, Snik AF. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 69(7):973-80. PubMed ID: 15911017 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients. Hol MK, Bosman AJ, Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. Audiol Neurootol; 2004 Jul; 9(5):274-81. PubMed ID: 15316200 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the bone-anchored hearing aids Baha Compact and Baha Divino. Kompis M, Krebs M, Häusler R. Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Aug; 127(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17762993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the "snap" abutment. Verstraeten N, Zarowski AJ, Somers T, Riff D, Offeciers EF. Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 18957902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone-anchored Hearing Aids: correlation between pure-tone thresholds and outcome in three user groups. Pfiffner F, Kompis M, Stieger C. Otol Neurotol; 2009 Oct; 30(7):884-90. PubMed ID: 19730146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Understanding speech in noise after correction of congenital unilateral aural atresia: effects of age in the emergence of binaural squelch but not in use of head-shadow. Gray L, Kesser B, Cole E. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1281-7. PubMed ID: 19581007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults. Laske RD, Veraguth D, Dillier N, Binkert A, Holzmann D, Huber AM. Otol Neurotol; 2009 Apr; 30(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 19318885 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Audiometric results of bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid application in patients with bilateral congenital aural atresia. van der Pouw KT, Snik AF, Cremers CW. Laryngoscope; 1998 Apr; 108(4 Pt 1):548-53. PubMed ID: 9546268 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions. Snik AF, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW. Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Bone anchored auditory prosthesis. Indications, clinical and audiometric results]. Belus JF, Sarabian A, Triglia JM, Zanaret M. Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1996 Feb; 113(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 8999748 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources. Ricketts TA, Grantham DW, Ashmead DH, Haynes DS, Labadie RF. Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 17086085 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience. Wazen JJ, Caruso M, Tjellstrom A. Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 9831146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]