These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

151 related items for PubMed ID: 11468802

  • 1. Chest wall thickness measurements and the dosimetric implications for male workers in the south Korean uranium industry.
    Kramer GH, Lee TY, Lee JI, Chang SY.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 95(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11468802
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Calculation of the uncertainty in the activity estimate for workers in the uranium industry.
    Sabbir Ahmed A, Kramer GH, Allen S.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Jan; 143(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 21075762
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of group monitoring data in lung dose estimation for intakes of uranium.
    Takala JM, Kramer GH.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003 Jan; 105(1-4):409-12. PubMed ID: 14526998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Lung counting: summing techniques to reduce the MDA.
    Kramer GH, Hauck BM, Allen SA, Dantas BM, Dantas AL, Azeredo AM.
    Health Phys; 2003 Aug; 85(2):220-7. PubMed ID: 12938970
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A Bayesian analysis of uncertainties on lung doses resulting from occupational exposures to uranium.
    Puncher M, Birchall A, Bull RK.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 23528329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Collective dosimetry to distinguish occupational exposure to natural uranium from alimentary uranium background in bioassay measurements.
    Davesne E, Blanchin N, Chojnacki E, Touri L, Ruffin M, Blanchardon E, Franck D.
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2014 Nov; 90(11):1048-54. PubMed ID: 24844375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Worker protection implications of the solubility and human metabolism of modern uranium mill products in the U.S.
    Brown SH, Chambers DB.
    Health Phys; 2014 Nov; 107(5):403-9. PubMed ID: 25271930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A cytogenetic study of men occupationally exposed to uranium.
    Martin F, Earl R, Tawn EJ.
    Br J Ind Med; 1991 Feb; 48(2):98-102. PubMed ID: 1998615
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A study of worker dose distributions with respect to ICRP dose limitation recommendations.
    Johnston PD, Brenot J, Kendall GM.
    Health Phys; 1986 Nov; 51(5):579-99. PubMed ID: 3771220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Determination of the solubility and size distribution of radioactive aerosols in the uranium processing plant at NRCN.
    Kravchik T, Oved S, Paztal-Levy O, Pelled O, Gonen R, German U, Tshuva A.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008 Nov; 131(4):418-24. PubMed ID: 18676447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Nuclear medicine annual external occupational dose distribution: Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, year 2005.
    Mauricio CL, Lima AL, da Silva HL, Souza-Santos D, Silva CR.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Mar; 144(1-4):510-4. PubMed ID: 21051433
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.