These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

268 related items for PubMed ID: 11479595

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Failure of extra-embryonic progenitor maintenance in the absence of dosage compensation.
    Mugford JW, Yee D, Magnuson T.
    Development; 2012 Jun; 139(12):2130-8. PubMed ID: 22573614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. De novo DNA methylation independent establishment of maternal imprint on X chromosome in mouse oocytes.
    Chiba H, Hirasawa R, Kaneda M, Amakawa Y, Li E, Sado T, Sasaki H.
    Genesis; 2008 Dec; 46(12):768-74. PubMed ID: 18932249
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Spontaneous reactivation of clusters of X-linked genes is associated with the plasticity of X-inactivation in mouse trophoblast stem cells.
    Dubois A, Deuve JL, Navarro P, Merzouk S, Pichard S, Commere PH, Louise A, Arnaud D, Avner P, Morey C.
    Stem Cells; 2014 Feb; 32(2):377-90. PubMed ID: 24115267
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Esx1 is an X-chromosome-imprinted regulator of placental development and fetal growth.
    Li Y, Behringer RR.
    Nat Genet; 1998 Nov; 20(3):309-11. PubMed ID: 9806555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Biparental expression of ESX1L gene in placentas from normal and intrauterine growth-restricted pregnancies.
    Grati FR, Sirchia SM, Gentilin B, Rossella F, Ramoscelli L, Antonazzo P, Cavallari U, Bulfamante G, Cetin I, Simoni G, Miozzo M.
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2004 Apr; 12(4):272-8. PubMed ID: 14673477
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. X-chromosome activity: impact of imprinting and chromatin structure.
    Jamieson RV, Tam PP, Gardiner-Garden M.
    Int J Dev Biol; 1996 Dec; 40(6):1065-80. PubMed ID: 9032012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Genomic imprinting in the placenta.
    Wagschal A, Feil R.
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2006 Dec; 113(1-4):90-8. PubMed ID: 16575167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Examining histone acetlylation at specific genomic regions.
    Hu JF, Hoffman AR.
    Methods Mol Biol; 2001 Dec; 181():285-96. PubMed ID: 12843458
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. X inactivation Xplained.
    Wutz A, Gribnau J.
    Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2007 Oct; 17(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 17869504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. X-chromosome inactivation occurs at different times in different tissues of the post-implantation mouse embryo.
    Tan SS, Williams EA, Tam PP.
    Nat Genet; 1993 Feb; 3(2):170-4. PubMed ID: 8499950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Low-copy-number human transgene is recognized as an X inactivation center in mouse ES cells, but fails to induce cis-inactivation in chimeric mice.
    Migeon BR, Winter H, Kazi E, Chowdhury AK, Hughes A, Haisley-Royster C, Morrison H, Jeppesen P.
    Genomics; 2001 Jan 15; 71(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 11161809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Differential expression of alpha-fetoprotein genes on the inactive X chromosome in extraembryonic and somatic tissues of a transgenic mouse line.
    Krumlauf R, Chapman VM, Hammer RE, Brinster R, Tilghman SM.
    Nature; 2001 Jan 15; 319(6050):224-6. PubMed ID: 2418359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Reduced proportion of Purkinje cells expressing paternally derived mutant Mecp2308 allele in female mouse cerebellum is not due to a skewed primary pattern of X-chromosome inactivation.
    Watson CM, Pelka GJ, Radziewic T, Shahbazian MD, Christodoulou J, Williamson SL, Tam PP.
    Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Jul 01; 14(13):1851-61. PubMed ID: 15888476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Identification of the mouse paternally expressed imprinted gene Zdbf2 on chromosome 1 and its imprinted human homolog ZDBF2 on chromosome 2.
    Kobayashi H, Yamada K, Morita S, Hiura H, Fukuda A, Kagami M, Ogata T, Hata K, Sotomaru Y, Kono T.
    Genomics; 2009 May 01; 93(5):461-72. PubMed ID: 19200453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Familial cases of point mutations in the XIST promoter reveal a correlation between CTCF binding and pre-emptive choices of X chromosome inactivation.
    Pugacheva EM, Tiwari VK, Abdullaev Z, Vostrov AA, Flanagan PT, Quitschke WW, Loukinov DI, Ohlsson R, Lobanenkov VV.
    Hum Mol Genet; 2005 Apr 01; 14(7):953-65. PubMed ID: 15731119
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. RNA and protein actors in X-chromosome inactivation.
    Masui O, Heard E.
    Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2006 Apr 01; 71():419-28. PubMed ID: 17381324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The Polycomb group protein EED is dispensable for the initiation of random X-chromosome inactivation.
    Kalantry S, Magnuson T.
    PLoS Genet; 2006 May 01; 2(5):e66. PubMed ID: 16680199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.