These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

506 related items for PubMed ID: 11480646

  • 1. The performance of bonded vs. pin-retained complex amalgam restorations: a five-year clinical evaluation.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Jul; 132(7):923-31. PubMed ID: 11480646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Six-year clinical evaluation of bonded and pin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Summitt JB, Burgess JO, Berry TG, Robbins JW, Osborne JW, Haveman CW.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Jul; 29(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 15195725
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of pulp protection technique on the clinical performance of amalgam restorations: three-year results.
    Baratieri LN, Machado A, Van Noort R, Ritter AV, Baratieri NM.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jul; 27(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 12120767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Review of bonded amalgam restorations, and assessment in a general practice over five years.
    Smales RJ, Wetherell JD.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Jul; 25(5):374-81. PubMed ID: 11203845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. A two-year randomized, controlled clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Setcos JC, Staninec M, Wilson NH.
    J Adhes Dent; 1999 Jul; 1(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 11725662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Two-year clinical evaluation of an amalgam adhesive.
    Belcher MA, Stewart GP.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Mar; 128(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 9066215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Mar; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Microleakage and retention of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Winkler MM, Moore BK, Rhodes B, Swartz M.
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):245-50. PubMed ID: 11764110
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Efficacy of bonded and nonbonded amalgam in the treatment of teeth with incomplete fractures.
    Davis R, Overton JD.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 Apr; 131(4):469-78. PubMed ID: 10770009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D, Harnirattisai C, Burrow MF.
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique.
    Baratieri LN, Ritter AV.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2001 Feb; 13(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 11831309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations in endodontically treated premolar teeth: a one-year evaluation.
    Ahrari F, Nojoomian M, Moosavi H.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Oct 14; 11(5):009-16. PubMed ID: 20978719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A clinical study of adhesive amalgam in pediatric dental practice.
    Cannon ML, Tylka JA, Sandrik J.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1999 Apr 14; 20(4):331-4, 336, 338 passim; quiz 344. PubMed ID: 11692340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL, Evans DB, Maxson BB.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Apr 14; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The integrity of bonded amalgam restorations: a clinical evaluation after five years.
    Mach Z, Regent J, Staninec M, Mrklas L, Setcos JC.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Apr 14; 133(4):460-7; quiz 493. PubMed ID: 11991463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Fracture resistance of complex amalgam restorations.
    Burgess JO, Alvarez A, Summitt JB.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Apr 14; 22(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9484151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Retentive strength of an amalgam bonding agent: chemical vs light vs dual curing.
    Winkler MM, Rhodes B, Moore BK.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Apr 14; 25(6):505-11. PubMed ID: 11203863
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations: effect of thermal cycling.
    Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y, Karezis A.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Apr 14; 25(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 11203837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Effect of restoration size on fracture resistance of bonded amalgam restorations.
    Lindemuth JS, Hagge MS, Broome JS.
    Oper Dent; 2000 Apr 14; 25(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 11203813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.