These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 1149473

  • 1. Superior recall of letters in the right visual field with bilateral presentation and partial report.
    Rosen JJ, Curcio F, Mackavey W, Hebert J.
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):144-54. PubMed ID: 1149473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Recall of letters from the left and right visual half-fields under unilater and bilateral presentation.
    Hines D.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 1272699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Asymmetry of visual perception].
    Kostandov EA, Reshchikova TN, Shostakovich GS, Genkina OA.
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1977 Apr; 27(3):545-52. PubMed ID: 899258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Internal verbalization and recognition performance in patients with unilateral cortical lesions].
    Guth U, Sehi I, Cohen R.
    Nervenarzt; 1984 Jun; 55(6):312-6. PubMed ID: 6205281
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Asymmetrical processing of tachistoscopic inputs in undergraduates across sex, handedness, field-side, and fixation instructions.
    Iaccino JF.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 2):1203-13. PubMed ID: 2399095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Attentional bias and visual field asymmetry.
    Beaumont JG, Colley M.
    Cortex; 1980 Oct; 16(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 7214924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Left and right visual field superiority for letter classification.
    Jonides J.
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1979 Aug; 31(3):423-39. PubMed ID: 504547
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Tachistoscopic recognition of normal and mirror images of Kana and Kanji characters.
    Shimizu A, Endo M, Nakamura I.
    Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn; 1983 Aug; 37(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 6884915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Determinants of the enhancement of the right visual field advantage by bilateral vs. unilateral stimuli.
    Liederman J.
    Cortex; 1986 Dec; 22(4):553-65. PubMed ID: 3816240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Tachistoscopic recognition of Kana and Hangul words, handedness and shift of laterality difference.
    Shimizu A, Endo M.
    Neuropsychologia; 1981 Dec; 19(5):665-73. PubMed ID: 7312151
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Do concurrent verbal memory loads influence the verbal laterality pattern in the bilateral task?
    Duda PD.
    Brain Lang; 1983 Sep; 20(1):65-78. PubMed ID: 6626946
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Asynchrony of lateral onset as a factor in difference in visual field.
    Hatta T.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Feb; 42(1):163-6. PubMed ID: 1256971
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Visual hemifield differences depend on typeface.
    Bryden MP, Allard F.
    Brain Lang; 1976 Apr; 3(2):191-200. PubMed ID: 938926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.