These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


166 related items for PubMed ID: 11504440

  • 21. Surface roughness of different dental materials before and after simulated toothbrushing in vitro.
    Heintze SD, Forjanic M.
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 16268397
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. In vitro wear of indirect composite restoratives.
    Suzuki S, Nagai E, Taira Y, Minesaki Y.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 12447221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
    Chaiyabutr Y, McGowan S, Phillips KM, Kois JC, Giordano RA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Adhesion of Streptococcus mutans NCTC 10449 to artificial teeth: an in vitro study.
    Hahnel S, Rosentritt M, Bürgers R, Handel G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Oct; 100(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 18922260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. An investigation of the effect of scaling-induced surface roughness on bacterial adhesion in common fixed dental restorative materials.
    Checketts MR, Turkyilmaz I, Asar NV.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1265-70. PubMed ID: 24831748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials.
    Kim BK, Bae HE, Shim JS, Lee KW.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 16198173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Influence of posts and cores on light transmission through different all-ceramic crowns: spectrophotometric and clinical evaluation.
    Carossa S, Lombardo S, Pera P, Corsalini M, Rastello ML, Preti PG.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001 Oct; 14(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 11842913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Effect of various treatment and glazing (coating) techniques on the roughness and wettability of ceramic dental restorative surfaces.
    Aksoy G, Polat H, Polat M, Coskun G.
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2006 Dec 01; 53(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 17097279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Dentin bond strengths of two ceramic inlay systems after cementation with three different techniques and one bonding system.
    Ozturk N, Aykent F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar 01; 89(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 12644803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The effect of different finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness of different composite restorative materials.
    Uçtaşli MB, Arisu HD, Omürlü H, Eligüzeloğlu E, Ozcan S, Ergun G.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Feb 01; 8(2):89-96. PubMed ID: 17277831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.