These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
293 related items for PubMed ID: 11517046
1. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses. Kim SJ, Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, La Trenta LR, Hadar O, Abramson A, Dershaw DD. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 11517046 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Interobserver Variability Between Breast Imagers Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS MRI Lexicon. Grimm LJ, Anderson AL, Baker JA, Johnson KS, Walsh R, Yoon SC, Ghate SV. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 May; 204(5):1120-4. PubMed ID: 25905951 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast imaging reporting and data system standardized mammography lexicon: observer variability in lesion description. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Floyd CE. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):773-8. PubMed ID: 8610547 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories. Liberman L, Abramson AF, Squires FB, Glassman JR, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. BI-RADS MRI enhancement characteristics of ductal carcinoma in situ. Rosen EL, Smith-Foley SA, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Peacock S, Lehman CD. Breast J; 2007 Jul; 13(6):545-50. PubMed ID: 17983393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) lexicon for breast MRI: interobserver variability in the description and assignment of BI-RADS category. El Khoury M, Lalonde L, David J, Labelle M, Mesurolle B, Trop I. Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 25454100 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging in probably benign lesions (BI-RADS category 3) of the breast. Gökalp G, Topal U. Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):436-44. PubMed ID: 16316732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. Gutierrez RL, DeMartini WB, Eby PR, Kurland BF, Peacock S, Lehman CD. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):994-1000. PubMed ID: 19770321 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast MRI in the evaluation of locally recurrent or new breast cancer in the postoperative patient: correlation of morphology and enhancement features with the BI-RADS category. Seely JM, Nguyen ET, Jaffey J. Acta Radiol; 2007 Oct; 48(8):838-45. PubMed ID: 17851971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast lesions detected on MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJ, Kaplan JB, LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Abramson AF, Dashnaw SM, Ballon DJ, Dershaw DD. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jul; 179(1):171-8. PubMed ID: 12076929 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Observer variability of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for breast ultrasound. Lee HJ, Kim EK, Kim MJ, Youk JH, Lee JY, Kang DR, Oh KK. Eur J Radiol; 2008 Feb; 65(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 17531417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]