These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

150 related items for PubMed ID: 11519555

  • 1. Three-dimensional dynamic MR hysterosalpingography: a preliminary report.
    Wiesner W, Ruehm SG, Bongartz G, Kaim A, Reese E, De Geyter C.
    Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(8):1439-44. PubMed ID: 11519555
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Fallopian tubal patency diagnosed by magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography.
    Ma L, Wu G, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li L, Zhou W.
    J Reprod Med; 2012; 57(9-10):435-40. PubMed ID: 23091993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Three-dimensional dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography; a new, low invasive, radiation-free and less painful radiological approach to female infertility.
    Unterweger M, De Geyter C, Fröhlich JM, Bongartz G, Wiesner W.
    Hum Reprod; 2002 Dec; 17(12):3138-41. PubMed ID: 12456613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Feasibility of dynamic MR-hysterosalpingography for the diagnostic work-up of infertile women.
    Winter L, Glücker T, Steimann S, Fröhlich JM, Steinbrich W, De Geyter C, Pegios W.
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):693-701. PubMed ID: 20482222
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison between magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography and conventional hysterosalpingography: direct visualization of the fallopian tubes using a novel MRI contrast agent mixture.
    Duan N, Chen X, Yin Y, Wang Z, Chen R.
    Acta Radiol; 2020 Jul; 61(7):1001-1007. PubMed ID: 31684746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in diagnostic work-up of female infertility - comparison with conventional hysterosalpingography: a randomised study.
    Volondat M, Fontas E, Delotte J, Fatfouta I, Chevallier P, Chassang M.
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):501-508. PubMed ID: 29974219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the evaluation of tubal patency in infertile women: an observational study.
    De Felice C, Rech F, Marini A, Stagnitti A, Valente F, Cipolla V, Borgogni G, Meggiorini ML.
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Feb; 39(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 22675963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. MR hysterosalpingography in a rabbit model.
    Lee FT, Grist TM, Nelson KG, Chosy SG, Rappe AH, Shapiro SS, Kelcz F.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1996 Feb; 6(2):300-4. PubMed ID: 9132095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. MR hysterosalpingography with an angiographic time-resolved 3D pulse sequence: assessment of tubal patency.
    Sadowski EA, Ochsner JE, Riherd JM, Korosec FR, Agrawal G, Pritts EA, Kliewer MA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1381-5. PubMed ID: 18941073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Role of 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in the diagnostic work-up of female infertility.
    Cipolla V, Guerrieri D, Pietrangeli D, Santucci D, Argirò R, de Felice C.
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Sep; 57(9):1132-9. PubMed ID: 26663038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison between X-ray-hysterosalpingography and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography in the assessment of the tubal patency in the cause of female infertility.
    Pace C, Argirò R, Casadei L, Cesareni M, Orlacchio A.
    Radiol Med; 2022 Dec; 127(12):1373-1382. PubMed ID: 36167884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Three-Dimensional Hysterosalpingo Contrast Sonography with Gel Foam: Methodology and Feasibility to Obtain 3-Dimensional Volumes of Tubal Shape.
    Exacoustos C, Pizzo A, Lazzeri L, Pietropolli A, Piccione E, Zupi E.
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Dec; 24(5):827-832. PubMed ID: 28450252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. MR hysterosalpingography compared with conventional hysterosalpingography.
    Silberzweig JE.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):W350. PubMed ID: 19457804
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. MR hysterography using axial long TR imaging with three-dimensional projections of the uterus.
    Tello R, Tempany CM, Chai J, Ainslie M, Adams DF.
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 1997 Jun; 21(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 9152577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Investigation of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes using three-dimensional saline sonohysterosalpingography.
    Sankpal RS, Confino E, Matzel A, Cohen LS.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 May; 73(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 11336731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Magnetic resonance hysterography and hysterosalpingography using hyperpolarized (3)He: demonstration of feasibility in an animal model.
    Hagspiel KD, Altes TA, Mugler JP, Brookeman JR.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Dec; 12(6):1009-13. PubMed ID: 11105043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Usefulness of three dimensional transvaginal ultrasonography and hysterosalpingography in diagnosing uterine anomalies.
    Szkodziak P, Woźniak S, Czuczwar P, Paszkowski T, Milart P, Wozniakowska E, Szlichtyng W.
    Ginekol Pol; 2014 May; 85(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 25011216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. MR imaging of the inner ear and cerebellopontine angle: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional sequences.
    Czerny C, Rand T, Gstoettner W, Woelfl G, Imhof H, Trattnig S.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Mar; 170(3):791-6. PubMed ID: 9490977
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Automated three-dimensional coded contrast imaging hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography: feasibility in office tubal patency testing.
    Exacoustos C, Di Giovanni A, Szabolcs B, Romeo V, Romanini ME, Luciano D, Zupi E, Arduini D.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):328-35. PubMed ID: 22648792
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. MR hysterosalpingography: protocol development and refinement for simulating normal and abnormal fallopian tube patency--feasibility study with a phantom.
    Frye RE, Ascher SM, Thomasson D.
    Radiology; 2000 Jan; 214(1):107-12. PubMed ID: 10644108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.