These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

167 related items for PubMed ID: 11547679

  • 1. Faster introduction of cost-effective packaging films.
    Hunt N.
    Med Device Technol; 2001 Apr; 12(3):12-4. PubMed ID: 11547679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Meeting the needs of an ever-demanding market.
    Rigby R.
    Med Device Technol; 2002 Apr; 13(3):10-4. PubMed ID: 12030098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Medical packaging: more for less?
    Andrews J, Hunt N.
    Med Device Technol; 1999 Apr; 10(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 10387624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Myths and realities in medical packaging.
    Pilchik R.
    Med Device Technol; 2003 Mar; 14(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 12698692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Determining permeability and diffusion rates in polymer films and packaging materials.
    Levoguer CL, Williams DR.
    Med Device Technol; 1998 May; 9(4):14-8. PubMed ID: 10180742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. An international standard for terminally sterilized medical device packaging.
    Donawa ME.
    Med Device Technol; 1997 May; 8(6):10-2. PubMed ID: 10169623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cost effectiveness: designing research for product evaluation.
    Gift AG.
    Clin Nurse Spec; 1995 Jul; 9(4):204-6. PubMed ID: 7634229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Packaging challenges: the solution is just beyond the border.
    Merritt J.
    Med Device Technol; 2003 Mar; 14(2):12-5. PubMed ID: 12698691
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Adhesive and nonadhesive systems for health-care packaging.
    Pilchik R.
    Med Device Technol; 2000 Apr; 11(3):8-10. PubMed ID: 10947334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Easy-opening packaging systems.
    Schenck HE, Zeniti M.
    Med Device Technol; 2002 Apr; 13(3):36-8, 40. PubMed ID: 12030104
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Tests of the microbiologic barrier in sterile packaging].
    Jakimiak B, Röhm-Rodowald E.
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2002 Apr; 53(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 12235676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The ISO 11607 Revisions.
    Nolan PJ, International Standards Organization.
    Med Device Technol; 2006 Oct; 17(8):41-2. PubMed ID: 17153374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Achieving quality with machine vision systems.
    Med Device Technol; 2002 May; 13(4):46. PubMed ID: 12066340
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Medical packaging: towards global harmony.
    Pilchik R.
    Med Device Technol; 2004 Oct; 15(8):16-8. PubMed ID: 16225268
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Material selection.
    Hill D.
    Med Device Technol; 1995 Oct; 6(1):14-8, 20-1. PubMed ID: 10155370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A new microbial barrier test for porous medical packaging materials.
    Fielding P.
    Med Device Technol; 2001 Apr; 12(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 11547680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A packaging update. Recycling, testing, and pricing.
    Baker MC.
    Med Device Technol; 1995 May; 6(4):31-3. PubMed ID: 10155385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Professional product evaluation.
    Di Girolamo D.
    J Intraven Nurs; 1995 May; 18(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 7707173
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A potential method for the specification of microbial barrier properties.
    Scholla MH, Hackett ET, Rudys S, Michels C, Bletsos J.
    Med Device Technol; 2000 Apr; 11(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 10947325
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Medical device regs: are they doing the job? In the devices legislation is a thread of mistrust.
    Bryan-Brown C.
    AORN J; 1981 Apr; 33(5):954-6. PubMed ID: 6782951
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.