These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1251 related items for PubMed ID: 11568465

  • 1. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH, Friedman HJ.
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Promoting ethical and objective practice in the medicolegal arena of disability evaluation.
    Martelli MF, Zasler ND, Johnson-Greene D.
    Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am; 2001 Aug; 12(3):571-85. PubMed ID: 11478189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Admissibility of neuropsychological testimony after Daubert and Kumho.
    Stern BH.
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001 Aug; 16(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 11568467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Independent judicial research in the Daubert age.
    Cheng EK.
    Duke Law J; 2007 Mar; 56(5):1263-318. PubMed ID: 17593589
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: a new standard for scientific evidence in the courts?
    Zonana H.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1994 Mar; 22(3):309-25. PubMed ID: 7841504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Neuropsychiatry at the Courtroom Gates: Selective Entry or Anything Goes?
    Brakel SJ, Gonzalez ER, Cavanaugh JL.
    Semin Clin Neuropsychiatry; 1996 Jul; 1(3):215-221. PubMed ID: 10320423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Opinions and testimony of expert witnesses and independent medical evaluators.
    Schofferman J.
    Pain Med; 2007 Jul; 8(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 17610460
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. False confessions, expert testimony, and admissibility.
    Watson C, Weiss KJ, Pouncey C.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010 Jul; 38(2):174-86. PubMed ID: 20542936
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The impact of the Daubert case on modern litigation.
    Mavroforou A, Michalodimitrakis E.
    Med Law; 2008 Dec; 27(4):755-65. PubMed ID: 19202854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
    Levett LM, Kovera MB.
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Aug; 32(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 17940854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Lessons from Canadian Courts for All Expert Witnesses.
    Booth BD, Watts J, Dufour M.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Aug; 47(3):278-285. PubMed ID: 31097525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 63.