These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

244 related items for PubMed ID: 11575115

  • 1. Surface roughness of aesthetic restorative materials: an in vitro comparison.
    Rosen M, Grossman ES, Cleaton-Jones PE, Volchansky A.
    SADJ; 2001 Jul; 56(7):316-20. PubMed ID: 11575115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Scientific surface roughness values for resin based materials.
    Grossman ES, Rosen M, Cleaton-Jones PE, Volchansky A.
    SADJ; 2004 Aug; 59(7):274, 276, 278-9. PubMed ID: 15537027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of surface finish of new aesthetic restorative materials.
    Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Aug; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14753340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mechanical properties of compomer restorative materials.
    el-Kalla IH, García-Godoy F.
    Oper Dent; 1999 Aug; 24(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 10337291
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Surface roughness of light-activated glass-ionomer cement restorative materials after finishing.
    St Germain HA, Meiers JC.
    Oper Dent; 1996 Aug; 21(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 9002869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Surface finish of a new hybrid aesthetic restorative material.
    Yap AU, Mok BY.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Aug; 27(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 11933907
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Surface hardness and wear of glass ionomers and compomers.
    Peutzfeldt A, García-Godoy F, Asmussen E.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Feb; 10(1):15-7. PubMed ID: 9545914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Surface roughness and weight loss of esthetic restorative materials related to fluoride release and uptake.
    Yip HK, Lam WT, Smales RJ.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999 Feb; 23(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 10551132
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of the effect of topical fluorides on the commercially available conventional glass ionomers, resin modified glass ionomers and polyacid modified composite resins--an in vitro study.
    Setty JV, Singh S, Subba Reddy VV.
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2003 Jun; 21(2):55-69. PubMed ID: 14700337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Curing units' ability to cure restorative composites and dual-cured composite cements under composite overlay.
    Park SH, Kim SS, Cho YS, Lee CK, Noh BD.
    Oper Dent; 2004 Jun; 29(6):627-35. PubMed ID: 15646217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems.
    Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW.
    Oper Dent; 1997 Jun; 22(6):260-5. PubMed ID: 9610323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Surface roughness assessment of resin-based materials during brushing preceded by pH-cycling simulations.
    Turssi CP, de Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues Júnior AL.
    Oper Dent; 2001 Jun; 26(6):576-84. PubMed ID: 11699181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Polish retention of new aesthetic restorative materials over time.
    Yap SH, Yap AU, Teo CK, Ng JJ.
    Singapore Dent J; 2004 Dec; 26(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 15736840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.