These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

346 related items for PubMed ID: 11581638

  • 1. US stem cell policy comes under fire.
    Fletcher L.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):893-4. PubMed ID: 11581638
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Embryonic stem cell research controversy: focus on the private sector and international sphere.
    Kim S.
    Hastings Womens Law J; 2003 Oct; 14(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 16032810
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Protesters seek US ban on embryo stem-cell work...as Wisconsin researcher awaits go-ahead.
    Wadman M.
    Nature; 1999 Jul 08; 400(6740):96. PubMed ID: 10408425
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Congress debates stem cell research.
    Novak K.
    Nat Med; 2000 Jun 08; 6(6):614. PubMed ID: 10835663
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Stem cell research. Zerhouni's answer buoys supporters.
    Holden C.
    Science; 2004 May 21; 304(5674):1088. PubMed ID: 15155916
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biomedical policy. Draft stem cell guidelines please many, disappoint some.
    Holden C, Kaiser J.
    Science; 2009 Apr 24; 324(5926):446. PubMed ID: 19390007
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biomedical policy. Bush squeezes between the lines on stem cells.
    Vogel G.
    Science; 2001 Aug 17; 293(5533):1242-5. PubMed ID: 11509703
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Battle lines shift in stem-cell funding fight...as non-profit companies enter the fray.
    Smaglik P.
    Nature; 2000 May 04; 405(6782):6. PubMed ID: 10811186
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Stem cells. HHS inks cell deal; NAS calls for more lines.
    Holden C.
    Science; 2001 Sep 14; 293(5537):1966-7. PubMed ID: 11557847
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Stem cells. Restiveness grows at NIH over Bush research restrictions.
    Holden C.
    Science; 2005 Apr 15; 308(5720):334-5. PubMed ID: 15831721
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Stem-cell lines.
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 May 26; ():A12. PubMed ID: 15966127
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Embryonic stem-cell research exempt from ban, NIH is told.
    Wadman M.
    Nature; 1999 Jan 21; 397(6716):185-6. PubMed ID: 9930681
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. And what about the science?
    Kluger J, Lemonick MD.
    Time; 2001 Aug 20; 158(7):20-1. PubMed ID: 11554377
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. How Bush got there.
    Lacayo R.
    Time; 2001 Aug 20; 158(7):17-21, 23. PubMed ID: 11524869
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Troublesome questions.
    Civin CI.
    Stem Cells; 2006 Jun 20; 24(6):1411. PubMed ID: 16687465
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Embryos, stem cells, morality and public policy: difficult connections.
    Momeyer RW.
    Cap Univ Law Rev; 2003 Jun 20; 31(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 15156894
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. "We must proceed with great care".
    Gibbs N, Duffy M.
    Time; 2001 Aug 20; 158(7):14-6. PubMed ID: 11524868
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Stem cell research: is the law preventing progress?
    Enmon JL.
    Utah Law Rev; 2002 Aug 20; (3):621-48. PubMed ID: 15156897
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.