These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

486 related items for PubMed ID: 11590471

  • 1. [Primary open angle glaucoma in cornea plana masked by false normal applanation tonometry (Goldman) - a case report].
    Hafner A, Seitz B.
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2001 Sep; 218(9):621-5. PubMed ID: 11590471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical comparison of pascal dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in asymmetric open-angle glaucoma.
    Sullivan-Mee M, Halverson KD, Qualls C.
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):694-9. PubMed ID: 18091457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Keratometry, optic disc dimensions, and degree and progression of glaucomatous optic nerve damage.
    Jonas JB, Stroux A, Martus P, Budde W.
    J Glaucoma; 2006 Jun; 15(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 16778642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Glaucoma in a rural population of southern India: the Aravind comprehensive eye survey.
    Ramakrishnan R, Nirmalan PK, Krishnadas R, Thulasiraj RD, Tielsch JM, Katz J, Friedman DS, Robin AL.
    Ophthalmology; 2003 Aug; 110(8):1484-90. PubMed ID: 12917161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Wang J, Cayer MM, Descovich D, Kamdeu-Fansi A, Harasymowycz PJ, Li G, Lesk MR.
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
    Ceruti P, Morbio R, Marraffa M, Marchini G.
    Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry are not correlated with central corneal thickness in primary open angle glaucoma.
    Regev G, Harris A, Siesky B, Shoshani Y, Egan P, Moss A, Zalish M, WuDunn D, Ehrlich R.
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Feb; 20(5):282-6. PubMed ID: 20577097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Use of corneal pachymetry in ocular hypertension and chronic glaucoma].
    Detry-Morel M.
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 2004 Feb; (293):35-43. PubMed ID: 15510721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Undetected development of glaucoma after radial keratotomy.
    Scheuerle AF, Martin M, Voelcker HE, Auffarth G.
    J Refract Surg; 2008 Jan; 24(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 18269150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.