These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

227 related items for PubMed ID: 11601816

  • 1. Segmental mandibular reconstruction by microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis: an animal study.
    Ayoub AF, Richardson W, Koppel D, Thompson H, Lucas M, Schwarz T, Smith L, Boyd J.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 39(5):356-64. PubMed ID: 11601816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A new device for microincremental automatic distraction osteogenesis.
    Ayoub AF, Richardson W.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 39(5):353-5. PubMed ID: 11601815
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Primary study of the use of a shape-memory alloy distraction device in the dog mandible for alveolar ridge distraction: determination of osteotomy techniques and evaluation of osteogenesis outcome.
    Xie M, Xiao H, Hu M, Liu H, Li Y.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2876-83. PubMed ID: 22632929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Segmental mandibular reconstruction by elasticity distraction osteogenesis associated with guided bone regeneration].
    Zhou HZ, Hu M, Liu HC, Yao J, Ma L.
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Nov; 40(6):474-7. PubMed ID: 16329831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis: a comparison of distraction rates in the rabbit model.
    Stewart KJ, Lvoff GO, White SA, Bonar SF, Walsh WR, Smart RC, Poole MD.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1998 Feb; 26(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 9563594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Nonvascular transport distraction osteogenesis in bone formation and regeneration. Is it an accidental phenomenon?
    Guo P, Zeng JJ, Zhou N.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 25457741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Bone regeneration and docking site healing after bone transport distraction osteogenesis in the canine mandible.
    Nagashima LK, Rondon-Newby M, Zakhary IE, Nagy WW, Zapata U, Dechow PC, Opperman LA, Elsalanty ME.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 70(2):429-39. PubMed ID: 21601342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with newly designed electromechanical distractor.
    Aykan A, Ugurlutan R, Zor F, Ozturk S.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1519-23. PubMed ID: 24914755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Animal model for evaluation of strain gauge in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.
    Wu Z, Liu Y, Singare S, Li D.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 45(8):633-6. PubMed ID: 17651873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Distraction osteogenesis for reconstruction after mandibular segmental resection.
    Takahashi T, Fukuda M, Aiba T, Funaki K, Ohnuki T, Kondoh T.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 Jan; 93(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 11805773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Experimental evaluation of acute molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit model.
    Candırlı C, Dolanmaz D, Etöz OA, Avunduk MC.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 20576452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Experimental mandibular regeneration by distraction osteogenesis with submerged devices: preliminary results of a canine model.
    Rubio-Bueno P, Sanromán F, García P, Sánchez M, Llorens P, Nieto S, Adrados M, Sastre J, de Artiñano FO, Amde S, Naval L, Díaz-González FJ.
    J Craniofac Surg; 2002 Mar; 13(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 12000878
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Dynamic Analysis of New Bone Obtained by Nonvascular Transport Distraction Osteogenesis in Canines.
    Guo P, Zhou N, Lu X, Huang XP, Jiang XF, Wang Y.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 74(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 26044605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Immunohistochemical analysis of reconstructed sheep mandibles: transport distraction osteogenesis versus autogenous bone grafting.
    Çakır-Özkan N, Eyibilen A, Özkan F, Gülbahar MY, Kabak YB.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 69(4):1248-54. PubMed ID: 21055857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for dental implant rehabilitation following fibular reconstruction: a case series.
    Cheung LK, Chua HD, Hariri F, Pow EH, Zheng L.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):255-71. PubMed ID: 23351759
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Distraction osteogenesis with a fully implantable system. Experimental study].
    Ploder O, Mayr W, Schnetz G, Unger E, Plenk H, Losert U, Ewers R.
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1999 May; 3 Suppl 1():S140-3. PubMed ID: 10414101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Internal distraction osteogenesis with a unidirectional device for reconstruction of mandibular segmental defects.
    Rubio-Bueno P, Naval L, Rodriguez-Campo F, Gil-Díez JL, Díaz-González FJ.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 May; 63(5):598-608. PubMed ID: 15883932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Osteodistraction of mandibles with a small bone defect at the planned osteotomy site: a histological pilot study in dogs.
    Zandi M, Dehghan A, Saleh M, Seyed Hoseini SR.
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e204-9. PubMed ID: 24113296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.