These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
280 related items for PubMed ID: 11604912
1. The coming of age of computerized ECG processing: can it replace the cardiologist in epidemiological studies and clinical trials? Kors JA, van Herpen G. Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1161-7. PubMed ID: 11604912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation by cardiologists in the setting of incorrect computer analysis. Anh D, Krishnan S, Bogun F. J Electrocardiol; 2006 Jul; 39(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 16777525 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Implications of methodological differences in digital electrocardiogram interval measurement. Badilini F, Sarapa N. J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4 Suppl):S152-6. PubMed ID: 16920141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms. Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, van Bemmel JH, Brohet C, Degani R, Denis B, Gehring J, Graham I, van Herpen G. N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec 19; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of computerized ECG interpretation in clinical trials. Sheffield LT. J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct 19; 20 Suppl():37-44. PubMed ID: 3320258 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sample size, power calculations, and their implications for the cost of thorough studies of drug induced QT interval prolongation. Malik M, Hnatkova K, Batchvarov V, Gang Y, Smetana P, Camm AJ. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Dec 19; 27(12):1659-69. PubMed ID: 15613131 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Computerized serial comparison of electrocardiograms: program performance in myocardial infarction. Ariet M, Zhou S, DeLuca DC, Greenfield JC. J Electrocardiol; 2007 Apr 19; 40(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 17118395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Precision of QT interval measurement by advanced electrocardiographic equipment. Hnatkova K, Gang Y, Batchvarov VN, Malik M. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Nov 19; 29(11):1277-84. PubMed ID: 17100684 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms. Sekiguchi K, Kanda T, Osada M, Tsunoda Y, Kodajima N, Fukumura Y, Suzuki T, Kobayashi I. J Med; 1999 Nov 19; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Utilization of an automated ECG interpretation system in an ambulatory health service. Carel RS, Drory Y, Miller H, Kaplinski E. Med Prog Technol; 1978 Nov 13; 6(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 366369 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service. Woolley D, Henck M, Luck J. J Fam Pract; 1992 Apr 13; 34(4):428-32. PubMed ID: 1556536 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted interpretation of electro- and vectorcardiograms. Chapter IV. Achievements in the field of computer-assisted interpretation of electrocardiograms. Brohet C. Rev Inst Hyg Mines (Hasselt); 1980 Apr 13; 35(4):201-64. PubMed ID: 7015461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Status of computerized electrocardiography. Hongo RH, Goldschlager N. Cardiol Clin; 2006 Aug 13; 24(3):491-504, x. PubMed ID: 16939838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of ECG interpretation in the pediatric emergency department. Wathen JE, Rewers AB, Yetman AT, Schaffer MS. Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Dec 13; 46(6):507-11. PubMed ID: 16308065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]