These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

370 related items for PubMed ID: 11643875

  • 1. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth.
    Paulus SM.
    Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Constitutional law--John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth: removing courts from the decision to terminate life support systems.
    Christie SA, Howard ML, MacKenzie LA.
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 60(1):122-37. PubMed ID: 11652476
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Deciding for the incompetent patient: identifying the role of family members.
    Healey JM.
    Conn Med; 1984 Oct; 48(10):687. PubMed ID: 11644167
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach.
    Marzen TJ.
    Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The "terminal condition" condition in Virginia's Natural Death Act.
    Matthew DB.
    Va Law Rev; 1987 May; 73(4):749-81. PubMed ID: 11652506
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Family surrogate laws: a necessary supplement to living wills and durable powers of attorney.
    Hamann AA.
    Villanova Law Rev; 1993 May; 38(1):103-77. PubMed ID: 11654083
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Withholding life support treatment in Illinois--Part I.
    Hodgman DR, Frazer QR.
    Ill Bar J; 1984 Oct; 73(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 11658588
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Incompetents and the right to die: in search of consistent meaningful standards.
    Strasser M.
    KY Law J; 1984 Oct; 83(4):733-98. PubMed ID: 11654615
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan.
    Keilitz I, Bilzor JC, Hafemeister TL, Brown V, Dudyshyn D.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989 Oct; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Privacy I: surrogate decision making for the terminally ill.
    Eisenberg KG.
    Annu Surv Am Law; 1988 Oct; 1(2):353-84. PubMed ID: 11652656
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Judicial innovation and policy re-invention: state supreme courts and the right to die.
    Glick HR.
    West Polit Q; 1992 Oct; ():71-92. PubMed ID: 11652627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri.
    Johnson SH.
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1986 Oct; 30(3):805-32. PubMed ID: 11649879
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Death with dignity in Mississippi? An analysis of Mississippi's Natural Death Act.
    Vitiello M.
    Miss Law J; 1984 Oct; 54(3&4):459-507. PubMed ID: 11652509
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.