These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
95 related items for PubMed ID: 11644008
1. Parental notification requirements and administrative law II. Healey JM. Conn Med; 1983 May; 47(5):307. PubMed ID: 11644008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers. Wardle LD. Neb Law Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Judge bars birth control notification. Hilts PJ. Washington Post; 1983 Feb 15; ():A1, A6. PubMed ID: 11646363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. U.S. defending notifying parents on birth control. Pear R. N Y Times Web; 1984 Mar 22; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11646453 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Heckler. U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Fed Report; 1983 Jul 08; 712():650-68. PubMed ID: 11648204 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Squelching the squeal rule. Kilpatrick JJ. Washington Post; 1983 Feb 25; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Teens left with many options despite 'squeal rule'. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Feb 25; 18(13):36. PubMed ID: 11658369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE. Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984 Feb 25; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]