These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

278 related items for PubMed ID: 11644178

  • 1. Sandra Day O'Connor and the justification of abortion.
    Werhane PH.
    Theor Med; 1984 Oct; 5(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 11644178
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
    Rhoden NK.
    Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Abortion and human rights.
    Horan DJ, Gorby JD.
    Hum Life Rev; 1976 Jun; 2(3):21-33. PubMed ID: 11663654
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers.
    Dougherty CJ.
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985 Jun; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The decline of personhood.
    Wauck J.
    Hum Life Rev; 1988 Jun; 14(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 11655918
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Abortion and infanticide: is there a difference?
    Cannon D.
    Policy Rev; 1985 Jun; No. 32():12-7. PubMed ID: 11655683
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Abortion and the Constitution: the need for a life-protective amendment.
    Destro RA.
    Calif Law Rev; 1975 Sep; 63(5):1250-351. PubMed ID: 11663611
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The right to life in law: the embryo and fetus, the body and soul, the family and society.
    Hicks SC.
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991 Sep; 19(3):805-50. PubMed ID: 11656190
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Abortion and euthanasia: recent developments of the law.
    Horan DJ.
    Forum; 1977 Sep; 12(4):960-79. PubMed ID: 11663978
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Abortion: a misplaced debate.
    Brockway AR.
    Engage Soc Action; 1974 Feb; 2(2):33-47. PubMed ID: 11663497
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR.
    Temple Law Q; 1974 Feb; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Confronting objections to an anti-abortion amendment.
    Byrn RM.
    America (NY); 1976 Jun 19; 134(24):529-34. PubMed ID: 11664690
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law.
    Tribe LH.
    Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov 19; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
    Minter CV.
    Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973 Nov 19; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Personhood, abortion and the law.
    Verkamp BJ.
    America (NY); 1982 Jan 23; 146(3):46-8. PubMed ID: 11658287
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Ethical problems of abortion.
    Bok S.
    Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 Jan 23; 2(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 11661052
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
    Rubenfeld J.
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb 23; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M.
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982 Feb 23; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Roe v. Wade--the abortion decision--an analysis and its implications.
    Riggs T.
    San Diego Law Rev; 1973 Jun 23; 10(4):844-56. PubMed ID: 11661026
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Foetuses, famous violinists, and the right to continued aid.
    Davis M.
    Philos Q; 1983 Jul 23; 33(132):259-78. PubMed ID: 11651766
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.