These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
286 related items for PubMed ID: 11644471
1. In re Bayer. Di Somma AV. Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):119-21. PubMed ID: 11644471 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. In re Bayer. Kirkpatrick GA. Issues Law Med; 1987; 3(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 11644092 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Estate of Virginia T. Prange. Di Somma AV. Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 11644470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. In re Drabick. Di Somma AV. Issues Law Med; 1989; 4(4):519-24. PubMed ID: 11644377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Delio v. Westchester County Medical Center. Kirkpatrick GA. Issues Law Med; 1988; 4(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 11644323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. In re Zahn. Kirkpatrick GA. Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 2(6):485. PubMed ID: 11644072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rasmussen v. Fleming. Pollard CT. Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 3(3):297-310. PubMed ID: 11644117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Decisionmaking in authorizing and withholding life sustaining medical treatment: from Quinlan to Cruzan. Keilitz I, Bilzor JC, Hafemeister TL, Brown V, Dudyshyn D. Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1989 May; 13(5):482-93. PubMed ID: 11654759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Newman v. William Beaumont Army Medical Center. Nimz M. Issues Law Med; 1987 May; 3(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 11644089 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. John F. Kennedy Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. Bludworth. Paulus SM. Issues Law Med; 1985 Sep; 1(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 11643875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical decisionmaking for the incompetent person: a comprehensive approach. Marzen TJ. Issues Law Med; 1986 Jan; 1(4):293-317. PubMed ID: 11651815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Decision on feeding tube sought in test case. Rust M. Am Med News; 1985 May 10; 28(19):1, 33-34. PubMed ID: 11653667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty. Bopp J, Avila D. Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr 10; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Rasmussen v. Fleming. Paulus SM. Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov 10; 2(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 11644062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. In the matter of George Clark. Nimz M. Issues Law Med; 1987 Mar 10; 2(5):409-12. PubMed ID: 11644464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Criminal law--homicide--removal of intravenous feeding line from vegetative, comatose patient at family's request is not murder. Barber v. Superior Court, 147 Cal. App. 3d 1006, 195 Cal. Rptr. 484 (1983). Crook RR. Cumberland Law Rev; 1987 Mar 10; 15(1):225-37. PubMed ID: 11652439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional law--can a "life advocate" impair the constitutional right to reject life-prolonging medical treatment?--In re Jobes, 210 N.J.Super. 543, 510 A.2d 133. Armstrong A. Cumberland Law Rev; 1987 Mar 10; 17(2):553-68. PubMed ID: 11658968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The due process "right to life" in Cruzan and its impact on "right-to-die" law. Bopp J, Avila D. Univ Pittsbg Law Rev; 1991 Mar 10; 53(1):193-233. PubMed ID: 11652639 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital. Nimz MM. Issues Law Med; 1986 Nov 10; 2(3):221-34. PubMed ID: 11644064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Should Paul Brophy have been allowed to die? Drinan RF. America (NY); 1986 Nov 22; 155(15):324-325, 332. PubMed ID: 11658771 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]