These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ. Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Amendments to Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. Public Law 98-457. United States. US Statut Large; 1984 Aug; 98(Title I Sections 101a-312a):. PubMed ID: 11686171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it? Clark FI. Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993 Aug; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Disabled newborns and the federal child abuse amendments: tenuous protection. Smith SR. Hastings Law J; 1986 May 26; 37(5):765-825. PubMed ID: 11655856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Born to live or born to die: the handicapped newborn in New Jersey. Sarno JJ. Seton Hall Legis J; 1987 Feb 24; 11(1):201-22. PubMed ID: 11651899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Advance directives: the United States experience. Cranford RE. Humane Med; 1993 Jan 24; 9(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11652943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn. Horan DJ, Balch BJ. Linacre Q; 1985 Feb 24; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule. Med World News; 1983 Jul 25; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]