These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

202 related items for PubMed ID: 11645557

  • 21. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.: stare decisis prevails, but for how long?
    Prieto P.
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 38(5):921-38. PubMed ID: 11655794
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The abortion cases.
    Rust ME.
    ABA J; 1986 Feb; 72():50-3. PubMed ID: 11655726
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Abortion 1984: the controversy continues.
    Healey JM.
    Conn Med; 1984 Apr; 48(4):269. PubMed ID: 11644128
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985 Apr; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe.
    Sendor BB.
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975 Apr; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code.
    Picher PC.
    Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974 Apr; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
    Rhoden NK.
    Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Abortion and the Pied Piper of compromise.
    Clark AE.
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 May; 68(2):265-329. PubMed ID: 11656365
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
    Rubenfeld J.
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. The Pennsylvania abortion case.
    Benshoof J.
    Touro Law Rev; 1993 Feb; 9(2):217-49. PubMed ID: 11656382
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Testimony opposing "Freedom of Choice Act.
    Alvare H, National Conference of Catholic Bishops.
    Origins; 1992 Apr 02; 21(43):692-6. PubMed ID: 11656134
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The abortion decision and evolving limits on state intervention.
    MacDougal D, Nasser WP.
    Haw Bar J; 1975 Apr 02; 11():51-72. PubMed ID: 11664576
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Reasoning from the body: a historical perspective on abortion regulation and questions of equal protection.
    Siegel R.
    Stanford Law Rev; 1992 Jan 02; 44(2):261-381. PubMed ID: 11656213
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
    Rush SE.
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987 Jan 02; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG.
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep 21; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Crain CA.
    Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990 Sep 21; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.