These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

158 related items for PubMed ID: 11646097

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The forcible medication of involuntarily committed mental patients with antipsychotic drugs--Rogers v. Okin.
    Robinson RM.
    Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):739-62. PubMed ID: 11658322
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Rogers v. Okin.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1980 Nov 25; 634():650-64. PubMed ID: 11648463
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Davis v. Hubbard.
    U.S. District Court, N.D. Ohio, W.D.
    Fed Suppl; 1980 Sep 16; 506():915-44. PubMed ID: 11648474
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The right to refuse treatment: Commonwealth developments and issues.
    Gordon R, Verdun-Jones SN.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1983 Sep 16; 6():57-73. PubMed ID: 11658523
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The rights of the mentally ill during incarceration: the developing law.
    Rastatter PC.
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1973 Sep 16; 25(3):494-520. PubMed ID: 11664236
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The 1983 revision of the Texas mental health code.
    Dix GE.
    St Marys Law J; 1984 Sep 16; 16(1):41-153. PubMed ID: 11658786
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Involuntary commitment and the right to refuse treatment with anti-psychotic drugs.
    Hahn WA.
    Creighton Law Rev; 1984 Sep 16; 16(3):719-42. PubMed ID: 11658455
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Court bolsters mental patients' rights.
    Herbert W.
    Sci News; 1982 Jun 26; 121(26):420. PubMed ID: 11658305
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The importance of establishing competence in cases involving the involuntary administration of psychotropic medications.
    Knepper K.
    Law Psychol Rev; 1996 Jun 26; 20():97-137. PubMed ID: 11656625
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Rogers v. Commissioner of Department of Mental Health.
    Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Suffolk.
    Mass Rep Mass Supreme Judic Court; 1983 Nov 29; 390():489-513. PubMed ID: 12041109
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Judicial schizophrenia: an involuntarily confined mental patient's right to refuse antipsychotic drugs.
    Cort RS.
    UMKC Law Rev; 1982 Nov 29; 51(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658656
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Two treatment rights cases argued at U.S. Supreme Court.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1982 Nov 29; 6(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 11652364
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The right to refuse treatment: mental patients and the law.
    Wade MD.
    Detroit Coll Law Rev; 1976 Nov 29; 1976(1):53-81. PubMed ID: 11664700
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Mental hospital drugging--atomistic and structural remedies.
    Gelman S.
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1976 Nov 29; 32(2):221-61. PubMed ID: 11658765
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The right to refuse antipsychotic medications: law and policy.
    Brooks AD.
    Rutgers Law Rev; 1987 Nov 29; 39(2-3):339-76. PubMed ID: 11659012
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. United States v. Leatherman.
    U.S. District Court, District of Columbia.
    Fed Suppl; 1983 Oct 05; 580():977-81. PubMed ID: 11648498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A model state law on civil commitment of the mentally ill.
    Stromberg CD, Stone AA.
    Harvard J Legis; 1983 Oct 05; 20(2):275-396. PubMed ID: 11658832
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.