These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

175 related items for PubMed ID: 11646131

  • 1. 'Baby Doe': it's not a 'medical' question.
    Arkes H.
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr 17; ():D7. PubMed ID: 11646131
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Regulating Baby Doe.
    Goodman E.
    Washington Post; 1983 Mar 16; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646280
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. 'Baby Doe' may be undone.
    Caplan AL.
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Feb 09; ():23. PubMed ID: 11646288
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. There should never be another Baby Doe.
    Meehan M, Budde ML.
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr 02; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11647759
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Baby Jane Doe: readers' responses.
    Marzen TJ, Uddo BJ.
    America (NY); 1984 Feb 11; 150(5):93-4. PubMed ID: 11658403
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. 'Infant Doe': a hospital ethics committee can help.
    Capron AM.
    Washington Post; 1983 Apr 23; ():A15. PubMed ID: 11646278
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Baby Doe and local option.
    Hentoff N.
    Washington Post; 1984 Jun 29; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646290
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Discrimination and Baby Jane.
    Will GF.
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec 01; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646274
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Big Brother in the nursery.
    Avery GB.
    Washington Post; 1983 Mar 23; ():A25. PubMed ID: 11646276
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Supreme Court and Baby Jane Doe.
    Drinan RF.
    America (NY); 1986 Mar 06; 154(9):180-2. PubMed ID: 11658666
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Baby Jane Doe.
    America (NY); 1983 Nov 19; 149(16):302-3. PubMed ID: 11658405
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Life, death and the rights of handicapped babies.
    Schmeck HM.
    N Y Times Web; 1985 Jun 18; ():C1, C3. PubMed ID: 11646493
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Another court challenge predicted following revised 'Baby Doe' rule.
    Med World News; 1983 Jul 25; 24(14):54, 59. PubMed ID: 11645668
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA.
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985 Jul 25; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Protecting handicapped infants.
    Washington Post; 1984 Dec 04; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11646438
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Should every Baby Doe die?
    Barringer F.
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov 27; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11646281
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Who should make medical decisions?
    Genel M.
    Conn Med; 1984 Aug 27; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Baby Doe's new guardians: federal policy brings nontreatment decisions out of hiding.
    Born MA.
    KY Law J; 1984 Aug 27; 75(3):659-75. PubMed ID: 11651897
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. If not that way, what way?
    America (NY); 1986 Jul 26; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Forgoing treatment of critically ill newborns and the legal legacy of Baby Doe.
    Nelson LJ.
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1992 Jul 26; 6(2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652072
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.