These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

146 related items for PubMed ID: 11646363

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Parental notification rule rejected again.
    Kamen A.
    Washington Post; 1983 Jul 09; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 11646365
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. U.S. defending notifying parents on birth control.
    Pear R.
    N Y Times Web; 1984 Mar 22; ():A13. PubMed ID: 11646453
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond.
    Best M.
    Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983 Mar 22; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Squelching the squeal rule.
    Kilpatrick JJ.
    Washington Post; 1983 Feb 25; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646218
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reagan administration decides not to appeal "squeal rule" defeat.
    Ob Gyn News; 1983 Feb 25; 19(3):3, 36. PubMed ID: 11653544
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD.
    Neb Law Rev; 1989 Feb 25; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. U.S. decides not to appeal on contraceptives.
    Barbash F.
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec 01; ():A21. PubMed ID: 11646273
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Parental notification requirements and administrative law II.
    Healey JM.
    Conn Med; 1983 May 01; 47(5):307. PubMed ID: 11644008
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. State of New York v. Schweiker.
    U.S. District Court, S.D. New York.
    Fed Suppl; 1983 Feb 14; 557():354-63. PubMed ID: 11648206
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Parental notification requirements applicable to projects for family planning services; final rule.
    U.S. Public Health Service.
    Fed Regist; 1983 Jan 26; 48(18):3600-14. PubMed ID: 11645488
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH, Hawn RH.
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982 Jan 26; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Planned Parenthood Federation of America v. Heckler.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.
    Fed Report; 1983 Jul 08; 712():650-68. PubMed ID: 11648204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
    Paul EW, Klassel D.
    Womens Rights Law Report; 1987 Jul 08; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Parental notification: a necessary first step.
    Hatch OG.
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1982 Mar 31; 128(35):S3164-8. PubMed ID: 11650721
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Abortion rule for under-18's upset by judge.
    Taylor S.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Nov 08; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647824
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Courts debate judges' role when girls seek abortions.
    Taylor S.
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Feb 23; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11646540
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Proposed parent notification plan draws criticism.
    Wood AP.
    Ob Gyn News; 1987 Feb 23; 17(5):1, 18-19. PubMed ID: 11654880
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. For minors, abortion limits have side effects.
    Diesenhouse S.
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Mar 19; ():E7. PubMed ID: 11647864
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.