These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

181 related items for PubMed ID: 11646727

  • 21. Understanding the new politics of abortion: a framework and agenda for research.
    Goggin ML.
    Am Polit Q; 1993 Jan; 21(1):4-30. PubMed ID: 11656206
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr 23; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. After Roe v. Wade: 10 years' conflict over abortion.
    Peterson B, Barbash F, Russell C.
    Washington Post; 1983 Jan 23; ():A1, A12-13. PubMed ID: 11647346
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH.
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992 Jan 23; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. U.S. judge strikes down Louisiana abortion law.
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Aug 08; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647442
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Of causes and clients: two tales of Roe v. Wade.
    McMunigal KC.
    Hastings Law J; 1996 Mar 08; 47(3):779-819. PubMed ID: 11658088
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
    Kassop N.
    PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar 08; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Will Webster redefine Roe v. Wade? The Supreme Court could use a Missouri case to begin limiting abortion rights.
    Chopko ME.
    Health Prog; 1989 Jun 08; 70(5):58-64. PubMed ID: 10293331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Gaining a right to abortion in the United States and Canada: the role of judicial capacities.
    DeLorme L.
    Berkeley J Sociol; 1991 Jun 08; 36():93-114. PubMed ID: 11656333
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Abortions.
    Maryland.
    Michies Annot Code Public Gen Laws Md Md; 1991 Jul 01; Sects. 20.201 to 20.211 20.214():. PubMed ID: 12043607
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world.
    Scott TL.
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1991 Jul 01; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM.
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992 Jul 01; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium.
    Chopko ME.
    Campbell Law Rev; 1990 Jul 01; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.