These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

168 related items for PubMed ID: 11647348

  • 1. Abortion, pain and survival.
    Goodman E.
    Washington Post; 1984 Feb 28; ():A17. PubMed ID: 11647348
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Abortion facts and feelings.
    Arkes H.
    First Things; 1994 Apr 28; 42():34-8. PubMed ID: 11652676
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. New poll finds wide support for abortion rights.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jan 21; ():A18. PubMed ID: 11647379
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Abortion is too complex to feel all one way about.
    Quindlen A.
    N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar 13; ():C2. PubMed ID: 11647368
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
    Chemerinsky E.
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1982 Mar 13; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. After Roe.
    Neuhaus RJ.
    Natl Rev; 1989 Apr 07; 41(6):38-42. PubMed ID: 11659127
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Legal abortion in America: factors in the dynamics of change.
    Cavanagh D.
    Lib Life Fam; 1996 Apr 07; 2(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 11660386
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Lawyers question letting fetus viability shape abortion law.
    Russell C.
    Washington Post; 1985 May 29; ():A4. PubMed ID: 11646219
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A middle ground on abortion.
    Dellapenna JW.
    Christ Crisis; 1980 Mar 31; 40(5):70-80. PubMed ID: 11658482
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Our bodies, our souls: rethinking pro-choice rhetoric.
    Wolf N.
    New Repub; 1995 Oct 16; 213(16):26, 28-29, 32-35. PubMed ID: 11656511
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study.
    Olmstead FH.
    Vt Law Rev; 1982 Oct 16; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Ethical problems of abortion.
    Bok S.
    Stud Hastings Cent; 1974 Jan 16; 2(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 11661052
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Study says anger troubles women denied abortion.
    Angier N.
    N Y Times Web; 1991 May 29; ():C10. PubMed ID: 11647439
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Abortion: are medicine and the law on a collision course?
    Pollner F.
    Med World News; 1985 Jul 08; 26(13):66-68, 70, 73+. PubMed ID: 11645557
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Growing into rights.
    Brody BA.
    Second Opin; 1989 Mar 08; (10):66-71. PubMed ID: 11651948
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. How technology is reframing the abortion debate.
    Callahan D.
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Feb 08; 16(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 3514547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Abortion: the seduction of medicine.
    Rodgers BD, Rodgers DE.
    Lib Life Fam; 1996 Feb 08; 2(2):285-308. PubMed ID: 11660385
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Medical responsibility for fetal survival under Roe and Doe.
    Sendor BB.
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1975 Feb 08; 10(2):444-71. PubMed ID: 11663614
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.
    Peterfy A.
    J Leg Med; 1995 Dec 08; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.