These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

421 related items for PubMed ID: 11647929

  • 1. Two Supreme Court rulings provide mentally ill defendants new protections.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1992 May 19; ():A14. PubMed ID: 11647929
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. New directions in the right to refuse mental health treatment: the implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ.
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 1993 May 19; 2(2):205-38. PubMed ID: 11659830
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Riggins v. Nevada: towards a unified standard for a prisoner's right to refuse medication?
    Dlugacz HA.
    Law Psychol Rev; 1993 May 19; 17():41-83. PubMed ID: 11659926
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Psychotropic medication in the criminal trial process: the constitutional and therapeutic implications of Riggins v. Nevada.
    Winick BJ.
    N Y Law Sch J Hum Rights; 1993 May 19; 10(Part 3):637-709. PubMed ID: 16708427
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The judicial side effects of involuntary medication as it relates to a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial: Riggins v. Nevada.
    Gutierrez L.
    Thurgood Marshall Law Rev; 1994 May 19; 19(2):355-77. PubMed ID: 11660111
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A review of the Burger Court: Part I.
    Parry J.
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 1984 May 19; 8(6):502-8. PubMed ID: 11658589
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Court upholds forced treatment of mentally ill by prison officials.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Feb 28; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647879
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: state of the law and beyond.
    Floyd J.
    Calif Law Rev; 1990 Oct 28; 78(5):1243-85. PubMed ID: 11659407
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Reevaluating substantive due process as a source of protection for psychiatric patients to refuse drugs.
    Brooks WM.
    Indiana Law Rev; 1998 Oct 28; 31(4):937-1017. PubMed ID: 15386905
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Right of a defendant to refuse antipsychotic medication during a criminal trial.
    Williams KG.
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep 28; 50(4):1937-9. PubMed ID: 11660177
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Fourteenth amendment--the right to refuse antipsychotic drugs masked by prison bars.
    Sindel PE.
    J Crim Law Criminol; 1991 Sep 28; 81(4):952-80. PubMed ID: 16145787
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. United States Supreme Court and psychiatry: a critical look.
    Malmquist CP.
    J Psychiatry Law; 1985 Sep 28; 13(1-2):137-64. PubMed ID: 11658821
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. New hearing on forced medication of inmate.
    Greenhouse L.
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Nov 14; ():A30. PubMed ID: 11646793
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Involuntary commitment: the move toward dangerousness.
    Weissbourd R.
    John Marshall Law Rev; 1982 Nov 14; 15(1):83-113. PubMed ID: 11658335
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Police power commitments: towards a legal response to violence among the mentally ill.
    Neff RC.
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1982 Nov 14; 13(2):421-61. PubMed ID: 11658796
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.