These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
306 related items for PubMed ID: 11648129
1. In tests on people, who watches the watchers? Hilts PJ. N Y Times Web; 1999 May 25; ():F1, F4. PubMed ID: 11648129 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethics lapses at Duke halt dozens of human experiments. Hilts PJ, Stolberg SG. N Y Times Web; 1999 May 13; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11648115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Duke's plan ends the ban on research. Hilts PJ. N Y Times Web; 1999 May 15; ():A10. PubMed ID: 11647663 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. halts research on humans at Duke: university can't ensure safety, probers find. Weiss R. Washington Post; 1999 May 12; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11647726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. 'Unchecked' experiments on people raise concern. Stolberg SG. N Y Times Web; 1997 May 14; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Medical ethics in the dock. N Y Times Web; 1994 Mar 14; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11647023 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. V.A. hospital is told to halt all research. Hilts PJ. N Y Times Web; 1999 Mar 25; ():A25. PubMed ID: 11648101 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. All is not well in research on human subjects. Goldman J. N Y Times Web; 1986 Mar 06; ():A26. PubMed ID: 11647822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Proposal on waiver of informed consent poses major issues for research ethics. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1997 Sep 06; 12(9):1-3. PubMed ID: 11660533 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Limited guardianship: additional protection for mentally disabled research subjects used in biomedical and behavioral research. Schaefer GF. Forum; 1981 Sep 06; 16(4):796-824. PubMed ID: 11651838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects. Wheeler DL. Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan 26; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey. Katz J. IRB; 1987 Jan 26; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "Evaluation of human subject protections in schizophrenia research conducted by the University of ..." (Part III). Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 2000 Jan 26; 15(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 11658036 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Money is putting people at risk in biomedical research. Andrews LB. Chron High Educ; 2000 Mar 10; 46(27):B1, B4-5. PubMed ID: 11657699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Government guinea pigs. Rothman DJ. N Y Times Web; 1994 Jan 09; ():E21. PubMed ID: 11646304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Duke research resumes; policy debate widens. Weiss R. Washington Post; 1999 May 15; ():A2. PubMed ID: 11647725 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. IRB review of adverse events in investigational drug studies. Prentice ED, Gordon B. IRB; 1997 May 15; 19(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 11656910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. An IRB member's perspective on access to innovative therapy. Moore DL. Albany Law Rev; 1994 May 15; 57(3):559-81. PubMed ID: 11652854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Informed consent in the clinical research setting: experimentation on human subjects. Owens JF. Med Trial Tech Q; 1987 May 15; 33(3):335-50. PubMed ID: 11653829 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurobiological research involving human subjects: perspectives from the Office for Protection from Research Risks. Puglisi JT, Ellis GB. Account Res; 1996 May 15; 4(3-4):261-5. PubMed ID: 11654521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]