These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Gillick v West Norfolk and Wisbech Area Health Authority. Great Britain. England. Court of Appeal, Civil Division. All Engl Law Rep; ; 1985(1):533-59. PubMed ID: 11648530 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Doe v. Pickett. U.S. District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Huntington Division. Fed Suppl; 1979 Nov 30; 480():1218-23. PubMed ID: 11648513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Requirements applicable to projects for family planning services: Public Health Service. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1982 Feb 22; 47(35):7699-701. PubMed ID: 10254378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Storm over Washington: the parental notification proposal. Kenney AM, Forrest JD, Torres A. Fam Plann Perspect; 1982 Feb 22; 14(4):185, 187-90, 192-7. PubMed ID: 7117507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Wicklund v. Lambert. U.S. District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division. Fed Suppl; 1997 Oct 09; 979():1285-90. PubMed ID: 11648429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Glick v. McKay. U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Fed Report; 1991 Jun 21; 937():434-43. PubMed ID: 11648595 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The evolution of the right to privacy after Roe v. Wade. Barnard D. Am J Law Med; 1987 Jun 21; 13(2 3):365-525. PubMed ID: 11659051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]