These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
211 related items for PubMed ID: 11648279
1. Mack v. Mack. Maryland. Court of Appeals. Atl Report; 1993 Feb 02; 618():744-76. PubMed ID: 11648279 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. In re Guardianship of L.W. Wisconsin. Supreme Court. Wests North West Rep; 1992 Apr 01; 482():60-79. PubMed ID: 12041147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc. Massachusetts. Supreme Judicial Court, Norfolk. North East Rep Second Ser; 1986 Sep 11; 497():626-46. PubMed ID: 12041216 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Withdrawal of life support: conflict among patient wishes, family, physicians, courts and statutes, and the law. Tarantino LM. Buffalo Law Rev; 1994 Sep 11; 42(2):623-52. PubMed ID: 11652996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. U.S. Supreme Court. Wests Supreme Court Report; 1990 Jun 25; 110():2841-92. PubMed ID: 12041283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. In re Guardianship of Myers. Ohio. Court of Common Pleas, Summit County, Probate Division. North East Rep Second Ser; 1993 Feb 26; 610():663-71. PubMed ID: 12041223 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In re Estate of Greenspan. Illinois. Supreme Court. North East Rep Second Ser; 1990 Jul 09; 558():1194-208. PubMed ID: 12041218 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. In re Guardianship of McInnis. Ohio. Probate Court, Stark County. North East Rep Second Ser; 1991 Nov 01; 584():1389-90. PubMed ID: 12041222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In re Estate of Longeway. Illinois. Supreme Court. North East Rep Second Ser; 1989 Nov 13; 549():292-322. PubMed ID: 12041217 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Right to die--court requires clear and convincing evidence of persistent vegetative patient's intent to terminate life-sustaining procedures; Health Care Decisions Act of 1993 casts new light on outcome. Brindisi TJ. Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1994 Nov 13; 23(2):619-44. PubMed ID: 16086514 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The care and treatment of the terminally ill: questions raised by McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc. Peters EA. Conn Law Rev; 1989 Nov 13; 21(3):543-50. PubMed ID: 11650429 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. In re Drabick. California. Court of Appeal, Sixth District. Wests Calif Report; 1988 Apr 12; 245():840-61. PubMed ID: 11648267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cruzan II: a clear and convincing travesty. Bopp J, Avila D. Natl Univ Law Rev; 1992 Apr 12; 1(1):1-47. PubMed ID: 11654704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]